{"id":4716,"date":"2025-04-23T12:47:58","date_gmt":"2025-04-23T09:47:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=4716"},"modified":"2025-04-23T12:47:58","modified_gmt":"2025-04-23T09:47:58","slug":"irfan-ince-cessas-el-fusul-fil-usul-6-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/irfan-ince-cessas-el-fusul-fil-usul-6-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130RFAN \u0130NCE: CESS\u00c2S, el-FUS\u00dbl F\u0130’L-US\u00dbL 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0130RFAN \u0130NCE: CESS\u00c2S, el-FUS\u00dbl F\u0130’L-US\u00dbL 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ana Temalar:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. S\u00fcnnet\u2019in Kur\u2019an\u2019\u0131 Neshi M\u00fcmk\u00fcn m\u00fcd\u00fcr?<\/strong>
    \nBu dersin merkezinde, \u201cS\u00fcnnet Kur\u2019an\u2019\u0131 nesheder mi?\u201d sorusu yer al\u0131r. Cess\u00e2s\u2019\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, Hanef\u00ee d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle uyumlu \u015fekilde, s\u00fcnnetin Kur\u2019an\u2019\u0131 neshedebilmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcr. \u0130mam \u015e\u00e2fi\u00ee ise Kur\u2019an\u2019\u0131n ancak Kur\u2019an ile neshedilebilece\u011fini savunur. Bu tart\u0131\u015fma, \u00f6zellikle zina cezas\u0131 ve varise vasiyet meseleleri \u00fczerinden somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Cess\u00e2s, Kur\u2019an\u2019da h\u00fckm\u00fc sabit olan ayetlerin s\u00fcnnetle de\u011fi\u015ftirilebildi\u011fini, bunun aklen ve dil a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu vurgular.<\/li>\n
  2. Zina Cezas\u0131 Tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve Muhsan-Gayrimuhsan Ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/strong>
    \nZina fiilinin cezas\u0131na dair ayetler ve hadisler incelenir. Ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta hapis ve eziyet cezas\u0131 getirilirken, ilerleyen s\u00fcre\u00e7te celde ve nihayetinde rejim cezas\u0131 devreye girer. Muhsan (evli) ve gayrimuhsan (bek\u00e2r) ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131r. Cess\u00e2s, bu h\u00fck\u00fcm de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin bir nesih s\u00fcreci olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fini savunur. Rejim cezas\u0131n\u0131n Kur\u2019an\u2019da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yer almamas\u0131 ise, s\u00fcnnetin bu cezay\u0131 koydu\u011funu ve bunun icm\u00e2 ile sabit oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterir.<\/li>\n
  3. La Vasiyete li\u2019l-V\u00e2ris Hadisi ve Vasiyetin Neshi<\/strong>
    \nKur\u2019an\u2019da yer alan \u201canne-babaya ve yak\u0131n akrabaya vasiyette bulunmak farzd\u0131r\u201d ayeti, \u201cvarise vasiyet yoktur\u201d hadisiyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Cess\u00e2s bu durumu, s\u00fcnnetin Kur\u2019an\u2019daki bir farziyeti ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir nesih \u00f6rne\u011fi olarak sunar. Ancak bu nesih vacipli\u011fin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve cevaza d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi \u015feklindedir. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f, Hanef\u00ee mezhebinin \u201cveresenin izniyle varise vasiyet caizdir\u201d ilkesini temellendirir.<\/li>\n
  4. Nesihte Tilavet-H\u00fck\u00fcm Ayr\u0131m\u0131 ve Tarihsellik Tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131<\/strong>
    \nCess\u00e2s, nesih t\u00fcrlerini tart\u0131\u015f\u0131rken h\u00fckm\u00fc neshedilmi\u015f ama tilaveti devam eden ayetlerin mevcudiyetine dikkat \u00e7eker. H\u00fckm\u00fcn neshi s\u00fcrecin nihayete erdi\u011finin bir beyan\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilir. Ayr\u0131ca, Hz. Peygamber\u2019in i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile gelen baz\u0131 d\u00fczenlemelerin icm\u00e2 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve tarihsel bir bilin\u00e7le okunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi savunulur.<\/li>\n
  5. Cedelin (Kar\u015f\u0131 Arg\u00fcman\u0131n) Us\u00fblde Yeri<\/strong>
    \nMetin boyunca Cess\u00e2s\u2019\u0131n tart\u0131\u015fma us\u00fbl\u00fcne dikkat \u00e7ekilir. Kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc kabul edilse dahi, o g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u00fczerinden kendi pozisyonunu savunma tekni\u011fi yo\u011fun bi\u00e7imde kullan\u0131l\u0131r. Bu cedel y\u00f6ntemiyle hem Hanef\u00ee g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi hem de kar\u015f\u0131t g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilir. Zina, vasiyet, k\u0131ble gibi meseleler \u00fczerinden bu y\u00f6ntem i\u015flenir.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong>
    \nBu seminer, nesih meselesi etraf\u0131nda d\u00f6nen mezhep i\u00e7i ve mezhepler aras\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, hem teorik hem de \u00f6rnekler \u00fczerinden detayland\u0131r\u0131r. Cess\u00e2s\u2019\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, Hanef\u00ee gelene\u011fin metne ba\u011fl\u0131 ama yorumcu bak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131, delil sistemati\u011fini, icm\u00e2 ve s\u00fcnnetin otoritesini ortaya koyar. Bir sonraki derste, k\u0131ble de\u011fi\u015fimi ve di\u011fer hadis \u00f6rnekleriyle, nesih tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n daha ileri boyutlar\u0131 ele al\u0131nacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Main Themes:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Can the Sunnah Abrogate the Qur\u2019an?<\/strong>
      \nThe central issue in this session is whether the Sunnah can abrogate the Qur\u2019an. Cess\u00e2s, in line with the \u1e24anaf\u012b school, argues that such abrogation is indeed valid. In contrast, Im\u0101m al-Sh\u0101fi\u02bf\u012b contends that only the Qur\u2019an can abrogate the Qur\u2019an. This debate is explored through case studies such as punishments for adultery and inheritance-related bequests, where Cess\u00e2s asserts that Qur\u2019anic rulings were superseded by Sunnah-based directives, a process justified linguistically and rationally.<\/li>\n
    2. Adultery Punishment and the Mu<\/strong>\u1e25<\/strong>\u1e63an-Ghayr Mu<\/strong>\u1e25<\/strong>\u1e63an Distinction<\/strong>
      \nThe seminar analyzes the evolution of legal rulings on punishment for adultery, which began with confinement and corporal punishment and eventually led to stoning (rajm). A distinction is drawn between married (mu<\/em>\u1e25<\/em>\u1e63an<\/em>) and unmarried (ghayr mu<\/em>\u1e25<\/em>\u1e63an<\/em>) offenders. Cess\u00e2s views this as a classic example of abrogation (naskh<\/em>), with the stoning punishment introduced via Sunnah and confirmed by consensus (ijm\u0101<\/em>\u02bf<\/em>), despite its absence in the final Qur\u2019anic text.<\/li>\n
    3. The Hadith \u201cNo Bequest for an Heir\u201d and the Abrogation of Bequest Rulings<\/strong>
      \nThe verse commanding bequests to parents and relatives is contrasted with the hadith \u201cThere is no bequest for an heir.\u201d Cess\u00e2s interprets this as an instance where the Sunnah abrogates a Qur\u2019anic obligation, transforming a binding command into a recommendation. This principle forms the basis of the \u1e24anaf\u012b rule that a bequest to an heir is valid only with the consent of the other heirs.<\/li>\n
    4. Differentiating Between Recitation and Legal Ruling in Abrogation<\/strong>
      \nCess\u00e2s distinguishes between abrogation of recitation<\/strong> (til\u0101wa) and legal ruling (\u1e25ukm), pointing out that some verses remain in recitation but are no longer legally binding. He also argues that certain rulings stemming from the Prophet\u2019s ijtih\u0101d must be evaluated against later ijm\u0101<\/em>\u02bf<\/em>, emphasizing the role of historical development and legal consciousness in interpreting prophetic action.<\/li>\n
    5. The Role of Dialectical Reasoning in Legal Theory<\/strong>
      \nCess\u00e2s frequently employs dialectical reasoning (jadal) by granting the opponent\u2019s premise and then refuting its conclusions. This method is used to clarify the limits of non-\u1e24anaf\u012b views and to defend the rationality and consistency of the \u1e24anaf\u012b framework. Case studies\u2014such as adultery punishment, bequests, and the change of qibla\u2014demonstrate how legal theory responds to practical and theological challenges.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Conclusion:<\/strong>
      \nThis seminar presents a detailed analysis of the debates around abrogation between Sunnah and Qur\u2019an, using doctrinal and case-based evidence. Cess\u00e2s articulates a nuanced \u1e24anaf\u012b position that affirms textual fidelity, rational interpretation, and the authority of consensus and prophetic action. The next session will further explore qibla redirection and additional case studies, expanding the discussion on the structure and scope of naskh<\/em> in Islamic legal theory.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      \u0130RFAN \u0130NCE: CESS\u00c2S, el-FUS\u00dbl F\u0130’L-US\u00dbL 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Ana Temalar: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4716","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4716"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4716\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4717,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4716\/revisions\/4717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}