{"id":4769,"date":"2025-04-23T21:49:25","date_gmt":"2025-04-23T18:49:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=4769"},"modified":"2025-04-23T21:49:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-23T18:49:25","slug":"oguz-haslakogluplaton-devlet-12-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/oguz-haslakogluplaton-devlet-12-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 12. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 12. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><br \/>\nOn ikinci seminer, <em>Timaeus<\/em> diyaloguna ili\u015fkin \u00f6nceki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemeleri derinle\u015ftirerek, \u00f6zellikle \u201ckora\u201d, \u201cgenesis\u201d, \u201cd\u00fcnamis\u201d, \u201ceidolon\u201d, \u201clogos\u201d ve \u201canalogon\u201d kavramlar\u0131 etraf\u0131nda kozmogonik bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme yapar. Ha\u015flako\u011flu, Platon\u2019un evren anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olu\u015fun (<em>genesis<\/em>) ve varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n (<em>on<\/em>) nas\u0131l bir ontolojik d\u00fczlemde ayr\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ayr\u0131m\u0131n \u00f6zellikle modern d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncede nas\u0131l sapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Kant, Aristoteles ve modern bilimsel terimlerle k\u0131yaslamal\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlemeler e\u015fli\u011finde, <em>kora<\/em> kavram\u0131 yeniden konumland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Genesis\u2019in Modern Anlay\u0131\u015fla Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131<\/strong><br \/>\nHa\u015flako\u011flu, <em>genesis<\/em> kavram\u0131n\u0131n sadece \u201cde\u011fi\u015fim\u201d ya da \u201chareket\u201d de\u011fil, do\u011frudan \u201cdo\u011fu\u015f\u201d anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fini vurgular. Newtoncu fizik ve Kant\u00e7\u0131 terminolojinin \u201colu\u015f\u201du yanl\u0131\u015f bir \u015fekilde \u201cde\u011fi\u015fim\u201dle e\u015fitlemesi, Platon\u2019un d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde merkezi olan varl\u0131kla var olmayan (<em>meon<\/em>) aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 silikle\u015ftirir.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Kora\u2019n\u0131n Metafizik Do\u011fas\u0131: Yer De\u011fil, Yatak<\/strong><br \/>\nPlaton\u2019un <em>kora<\/em> kavram\u0131, basit bir mek\u00e2n de\u011fil, do\u011fu\u015fun zemini olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131r. Kora\u2019n\u0131n \u201cs\u00fct anne\u201d ya da \u201cdamgalama yeri\u201d olarak kavramsalla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, onu pasif bir ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131c\u0131 olmaktan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p etkin bir <em>d\u00fcnamis<\/em> deposu h\u00e2line getirir. Kora, olu\u015fun g\u00f6r\u00fcnen de\u011fil, meon d\u00fczleminde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir formudur.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Eidos\u2013Eidolon\u2013Mimesis \u00dc\u00e7l\u00fcs\u00fc ve Taklidin Ontolojisi<\/strong><br \/>\nPlaton\u2019un mimesis anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde <em>eidolon<\/em> (suretin taklidi), <em>eidos<\/em>\u2019tan t\u00fcreyen bir temsil de\u011fil, <em>kora<\/em> arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla damgalanarak meydana gelen varl\u0131k bi\u00e7imidir. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7, Ha\u015flako\u011flu\u2019na g\u00f6re bir <em>analogon<\/em> ili\u015fkisi de\u011fil, do\u011frudan <em>mimetik<\/em> bir fiildir. Bu ba\u011flamda mimesis ile logos aras\u0131nda felsefi bir gerilim ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Teos\u2019un Kozmos\u2019u Bi\u00e7imlendirme Eylemi: Aritmos ve Skema<\/strong><br \/>\nPlaton\u2019un Teos\u2019u evreni <em>eidos<\/em> ve <em>aritmos<\/em> arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u015fekillendirir. Ancak bu \u015fekillendirme eylemi salt aritmetik-geometrik bir tasar\u0131 de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda bir damgalama (typ\u014dt\u0113s) fiilidir. Bu damgalama, <em>logos<\/em> de\u011fil, <em>mimesis<\/em> d\u00fczleminde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Bu yorum, kozmogoni anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 episteme d\u00fczeyinden farkl\u0131 bir sahneye ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Kozmos\u2019un Mimetik Yap\u0131s\u0131 ve \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u0130li\u015fki Alan\u0131<\/strong><br \/>\nHa\u015flako\u011flu, Platon\u2019daki yarat\u0131c\u0131 (Teos) ile evren (Kozmos) ili\u015fkisini klasik teistik ya da panteistik \u00e7er\u00e7evelerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u201cmimetik ili\u015fki\u201d olarak tan\u0131mlar. Ne ayn\u0131 ne de b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle farkl\u0131 olan bu ili\u015fki, sanat ontolojisine benzer bir yap\u0131da konumlan\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Kora, tanr\u0131n\u0131n taklit yoluyla yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir \u201cba\u015fkal\u0131k mek\u00e2n\u0131\u201dna d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong> Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><br \/>\nBu seminer, Platon\u2019un <em>Timaeus<\/em> diyalogundaki kozmogoniyi, mimesis ve genesis kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinden sahneleyen radikal bir yeniden yorum \u00f6nerir. Ha\u015flako\u011flu, Platon\u2019da olu\u015fun do\u011fu\u015fsal mahiyetini ve kora\u2019n\u0131n meon\u2019a a\u00e7\u0131lan berzah\u00ee yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, modern felsefi ve bilimsel ba\u011flamlar\u0131n \u00f6tesinde, \u00f6zg\u00fcn bir kavramsal d\u00fczlemde kurar. B\u00f6ylece mimetik eylem, Platon\u2019un evren tasavvurunun merkezine yerle\u015ftirilir ve klasik Platon yorumlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7ilerek yeni bir ontolojik perspektif a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><br \/>\nThe twelfth seminar deepens previous discussions on <em>Timaeus<\/em>, focusing on a cosmogenic analysis structured around the key concepts of <em>ch\u014dra<\/em>, <em>genesis<\/em>, <em>dynamis<\/em>, <em>eidolon<\/em>, <em>logos<\/em>, and <em>analogon<\/em>. Ha\u015flako\u011flu examines how Plato distinguishes between becoming (<em>genesis<\/em>) and being (<em>on<\/em>), and how this ontological distinction is misinterpreted in modern philosophy and science. He repositions <em>ch\u014dra<\/em> through comparisons with Kant, Aristotle, and post-Newtonian physics.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Main Themes and Topics<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Genesis vs. Modern Interpretations<\/strong><br \/>\nHa\u015flako\u011flu emphasizes that <em>genesis<\/em> in Plato means not just change or movement but birth or emergence. He critiques how Newtonian physics and Kantian thought reduce <em>genesis<\/em> to mere change, thereby erasing Plato\u2019s essential distinction between being and non-being (<em>meon<\/em>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Metaphysical Nature of Ch\u014dra: Not Space, but Womb<\/strong><br \/>\nPlato\u2019s <em>ch\u014dra<\/em> is not simply physical space but the ground of birth. Described as a \u201cwet nurse\u201d or \u201cplace of imprinting,\u201d it is not a passive container but an active reservoir of <em>dynamis<\/em> (potentiality). <em>Ch\u014dra<\/em> is not a visible form but a metaphysical condition where becoming occurs at the threshold of the <em>meon<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Eidos\u2013Eidolon\u2013Mimesis: The Ontology of Imitation<\/strong><br \/>\nIn Plato\u2019s framework, the <em>eidolon<\/em> (image) is not a mere derivative of <em>eidos<\/em> (form), but a configuration that arises through the imprinting process in <em>ch\u014dra<\/em>. According to Ha\u015flako\u011flu, this is not an analogical relationship but a mimetic act. A fundamental tension between <em>mimesis<\/em> and <em>logos<\/em> thus emerges within Plato\u2019s ontology.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Demiurge\u2019s Act of Formation: Number and Imprint<\/strong><br \/>\nPlato\u2019s Demiurge shapes the cosmos through <em>eidos<\/em> and <em>arithmos<\/em> (number), but the shaping is not purely mathematical\u2014it is also an act of <em>imprinting<\/em> (<em>typ\u014dt\u0113s<\/em>). This act occurs not within the realm of <em>logos<\/em> but through <em>mimesis<\/em>, marking a shift from rational explanation to performative creation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Mimetic Cosmos and a Third Mode of Relation<\/strong><br \/>\nHa\u015flako\u011flu describes the relationship between the divine (Theos) and the cosmos not in terms of classical theism or pantheism, but as a mimetic relation. The cosmos is neither entirely identical nor wholly different from its source. In this sense, <em>ch\u014dra<\/em> becomes a space of otherness shaped through divine imitation, similar in structure to artistic creation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong> Conclusion<\/strong><br \/>\nThis seminar offers a radical reinterpretation of Plato\u2019s <em>Timaeus<\/em>, viewing its cosmology not as a mythic narrative or conceptual system, but as a metaphysical staging of <em>genesis<\/em> and <em>mimesis<\/em>. Ha\u015flako\u011flu situates <em>ch\u014dra<\/em> as a threshold structure opening toward the <em>meon<\/em>, beyond classical dualisms of matter and form. Mimesis thus becomes the generative core of Plato\u2019s cosmology, offering a new ontological perspective that challenges conventional interpretations.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 12. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4769","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4769"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4770,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4769\/revisions\/4770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}