{"id":4798,"date":"2025-04-24T00:14:09","date_gmt":"2025-04-23T21:14:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=4798"},"modified":"2025-04-24T00:14:09","modified_gmt":"2025-04-23T21:14:09","slug":"oguz-haslakogluplaton-devlet-26-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/oguz-haslakogluplaton-devlet-26-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 26. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 26. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong>
    \nBu seminerde Ha\u015flako\u011flu, Platon\u2019un \u201cauto-urgike\u201d ve \u201ceidolopoike\u201d kavramlar\u0131n\u0131 merkeze alarak \u00f6zne, suret, kuvvet, hat\u0131rlama ve varl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Timaios ve Sofist diyaloglar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki ge\u00e7i\u015fi sa\u011flayan bu kavramlar \u00fczerinden Platon\u2019un metafizi\u011fi, modern d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin \u00f6zne anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ele al\u0131n\u0131r. Seminer, ps\u00fcke\u2019nin otokinetik do\u011fas\u0131 \u00fczerinden kuvvetin kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sorgular, dilsel temsilin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir ve Platon\u2019u anlaman\u0131n temelini suret metafizi\u011fiyle ili\u015fkilendirir.<\/li>\n
  2. Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    1. Auto-Urgike ve Eidolopoike Kar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong>
      \nAuto-urgike<\/em>, kendi ba\u015f\u0131na \u00fcretici olan, ger\u00e7ekli\u011fin kayna\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 faaliyet olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131rken, eidolopoike<\/em>, g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f ve temsile dayal\u0131 taklit faaliyetidir. Bu kar\u015f\u0131tl\u0131k, Platon\u2019un ontolojik d\u00fczeninde hakiki varl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f d\u00fcnyas\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 temsil eder.<\/li>\n
    2. Auto ve \u00d6znenin Kayna\u011f\u0131: Otokinesis ve Otomaton Ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/strong>
      \nAuto kavram\u0131, Descartes\u2019\u0131n ego cogito\u2019sundan farkl\u0131 olarak \u00f6zneyi de\u011fil, ps\u00fcke\u2019nin kendi kendini hareket ettirme (otokinesis) yetisini i\u015faret eder. Otokinesis, hareketin sebebinin ps\u00fcke\u2019nin kendisinde olmas\u0131d\u0131r; bu durum, onu otomaton\u2019dan ay\u0131r\u0131r: Otomaton nedensizce hareket ederken, otokinesis bilin\u00e7li kuvvetin kayna\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    3. Ps\u00fcke\u2019nin Hat\u0131rlamas\u0131: Anamnesis ve Unutu\u015f<\/strong>
      \nPlaton\u2019da ps\u00fcke\u2019nin hat\u0131rlama yetisi (anamnesis<\/em>), onun unutu\u015fa (amnesis<\/em>) d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir s\u00fcrecin tersine \u00e7evrilmesidir. Ps\u00fcke, hareketin kayna\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funu unuttu\u011funda doksan\u0131n g\u00f6lgelerine mahk\u00fbm olur. Bilgiye ula\u015fmak, bu unutulan kuvvetin yeniden fark edilmesiyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.<\/li>\n
    4. Suret ve Dil: Metafizik Temsilde Kriz<\/strong>
      \nSuret (eidolon) meselesi, Platon\u2019un dil ve temsil sorunuyla do\u011frudan ilgilidir. Modern felsefede form ve morphe kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinden yanl\u0131\u015f \u015fekilde yorumlanan eidos<\/em> ve eidolon<\/em> ili\u015fkisi, Platon\u2019un metafizi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 engeller. Ha\u015flako\u011flu, bu yorumlar\u0131 ele\u015ftirerek d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin dile mahkumiyetini ve dilden \u00f6zg\u00fcrle\u015fme gere\u011fini vurgular.<\/li>\n
    5. D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin Ko\u015fullar\u0131: Auto Kavram\u0131yla Felsefeye Giri\u015f<\/strong>
      \n\u201cAuto\u201dyu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeye ba\u015flamak, asl\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin kendisini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmeye ba\u015flamakt\u0131r. Platon\u2019un metinleri, bir temsil de\u011fil; d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnmenin zeminini a\u00e7an sahnelerdir. Bu ba\u011flamda filozofya, kendili\u011fin kuvvetini fark etmek, onu yeniden harekete ge\u00e7irmektir.<\/li>\n
    6. Aporya ve Ricat: Metinler Aras\u0131 Ge\u00e7i\u015fin Gere\u011fi<\/strong>
      \nPlaton metinleri do\u011frudan kavranabilir sistemler sunmaz; aksine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnsel ge\u00e7itlerin kapand\u0131\u011f\u0131 aporya<\/em>lar \u00fcretir. Bu nedenle \u201csuret\u201d kavram\u0131 etraf\u0131nda Sofist ve Timaios diyaloglar\u0131 birlikte okunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ge\u00e7i\u015f, yaln\u0131zca Platon\u2019un metafizi\u011fini de\u011fil, onun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce tarz\u0131n\u0131 da kavramak i\u00e7in zorunludur.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. Sonu\u00e7<\/strong>
        \nBu seminer, auto-urgike kavram\u0131 arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Platon\u2019un ps\u00fcke, hat\u0131rlama, kuvvet ve \u00f6zne anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 modern d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin dil ve temsil sorunlar\u0131yla birlikte tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Ha\u015flako\u011flu\u2019na g\u00f6re Platon\u2019da filozofya, doksadan kurtularak hakiki varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hareketine i\u015ftirak etmektir. Bu i\u015ftirak, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc kavramaya y\u00f6nelik bir tecr\u00fcbe olarak kendini g\u00f6sterir.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

         <\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong>
          \nThis seminar explores Plato\u2019s metaphysical framework through the concepts of auto-urgik\u0113<\/em> and eidolopoik\u0113<\/em>, focusing on subjectivity, image, force, memory, and being. Drawing from the Timaeus<\/em> and Sophist<\/em>, Ha\u015flako\u011flu examines the ontological distinction between creative self-generating activity and mere representation. Through the soul\u2019s self-motion (autokinesis<\/em>), the seminar investigates the nature of philosophical knowledge, the limitations of language, and the relation between thought and image in Plato\u2019s philosophy, while contrasting it with modern conceptions of subjectivity.<\/li>\n
        2. Main Themes and Topics<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
            \n
          1. Auto-Urgik\u0113 vs. Eidolopoik\u0113<\/strong>
            \nAuto-urgik\u0113<\/em> is defined as self-originating, authentic production tied to the source of reality. In contrast, eidolopoik\u0113<\/em> is the activity of creating appearances and representations. This distinction maps onto the Platonic divide between being and seeming.<\/li>\n
          2. Auto and the Origin of Subjectivity: Autokinesis vs. Automaton<\/strong>
            \nIn Plato, auto<\/em> does not refer to Cartesian subjectivity (ego cogito<\/em>) but to the soul\u2019s capacity for self-movement (autokinesis<\/em>). Unlike an automaton, which moves without conscious force, autokinesis<\/em> is an inner origin of motion, constituting the metaphysical basis of agency.<\/li>\n
          3. Memory and the Soul: Anamnesis and Forgetting<\/strong>
            \nThe soul\u2019s anamnesis<\/em> is its recovery from amnesis<\/em>\u2014a state of forgetfulness about its own origin as the source of motion. To know is to recollect this lost force. Ignorance results from the soul\u2019s entrapment in the shadows of doxa<\/em>.<\/li>\n
          4. Image and Language: The Crisis of Metaphysical Representation<\/strong>
            \nThe question of the eidolon<\/em> directly concerns the problem of linguistic and conceptual representation. Ha\u015flako\u011flu critiques modern misreadings that reduce eidos<\/em> to formal abstraction, arguing that Plato\u2019s metaphysics demands a thinking liberated from the prison of language and formalism.<\/li>\n
          5. Thinking the Auto: Philosophy as Self-Encounter<\/strong>
            \nTo think auto<\/em> is to think the ground of thinking itself. For Ha\u015flako\u011flu, Plato\u2019s texts are not representations of doctrine but scenes that open the space for thinking. Philosophy thus becomes the practice of awakening and reactivating the soul\u2019s inner force.<\/li>\n
          6. Aporia and Recession: The Necessity of Intertextual Reading<\/strong>
            \nPlato\u2019s works are not systematic treatises but orchestrated aporias\u2014sites of impasse. Therefore, the Sophist<\/em> and Timaeus<\/em> must be read together to grasp the metaphysical interplay of image and force. The path between dialogues mirrors the path of philosophical reflection itself.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
              \n
            1. Conclusion<\/strong>
              \nThis seminar reveals how Plato\u2019s notion of auto-urgik\u0113<\/em> allows for a radical reinterpretation of subjectivity, memory, and being. Through the soul\u2019s self-motion, philosophy emerges not as representation but as participation in the force of being. For Ha\u015flako\u011flu, philosophy in Plato is the soul\u2019s act of reclaiming its forgotten power\u2014a living encounter with the ground of thought.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

               <\/p>\n

               <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              O\u011eUZ HA\u015eLAKO\u011eLU:PLATON, DEVLET 26. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4798","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4798"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4799,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4798\/revisions\/4799"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}