{"id":4847,"date":"2025-05-05T12:47:22","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:47:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=4847"},"modified":"2025-05-05T12:47:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:47:22","slug":"ayhan-citil-aristoteles-metafizik-okumalari-18-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ayhan-citil-aristoteles-metafizik-okumalari-18-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 18. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 18. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong>
    \nBu seminer, i\u00e7sel olan ile d\u0131\u015fsal olan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi Aristoteles\u00e7i metafizik ba\u011flam\u0131nda fenomenolojik, epistemolojik ve kozmolojik a\u00e7\u0131lardan yeniden tart\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lar. Ayhan \u00c7itil, \u201cben\u201d, \u201cg\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f\u201d, \u201ckendindelik\u201d, \u201czaman\u201d, \u201cmek\u00e2n\u201d ve \u201cnedensellik\u201d kavramlar\u0131 etraf\u0131nda Platon, Kant, Hume ve modern fizik (\u00f6zellikle kuantum teorisi) ile etkile\u015fimli bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme sunar. Seminer, klasik cevher ontolojisini \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck problemi ve teorik fizi\u011fin temel yap\u0131lar\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya getirerek d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcrmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  2. Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    1. Benli\u011fin Kurulu\u015fu ve Kendindelik<\/strong>
      \n\u201cBen\u201d dedi\u011fimiz \u015fey, \u201ckendinde olan\u201d ile kurulan bir bo\u015fluk arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla \u015fekillenir. Bu bo\u015fluk, benli\u011fin ayr\u0131mla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kendini fark etmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131lar. Bu s\u00fcrecin temelinde, zihinsel bir fiil olarak muhayyilenin faaliyeti yatar.<\/li>\n
    2. Mek\u00e2n ve Zaman\u0131n Ontolojik Stat\u00fcs\u00fc<\/strong>
      \n\u00c7itil, mek\u00e2n ve zaman\u0131n klasik anlamda nesnele\u015femeyen, ancak \u00e7eli\u015fkisel yap\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerinden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmesi gereken fenomenal yap\u0131lar oldu\u011funu savunur. Mek\u00e2n ve zaman\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fi, s\u0131f\u0131r\u0131n ve bo\u015flu\u011fun izleriyle a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131r; bu da onlar\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fik ama zorunlu birer d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme zemini oldu\u011funu ortaya koyar.<\/li>\n
    3. G\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f, Ger\u00e7eklik ve Tezah\u00fcr<\/strong>
      \nKendinde olan, \u00fc\u00e7 boyutlu bir d\u00fcnyada fenomenal olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr hale gelir. Bu g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcrl\u00fck, bir ger\u00e7eklik ta\u015f\u0131r; ama bu ger\u00e7eklik, kendinde olan\u0131n tam kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil, onun bir tezah\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u00c7itil bu durumu “yorgan\u0131n d\u0131\u015far\u0131 ta\u015fmas\u0131” metaforuyla a\u00e7\u0131klar.<\/li>\n
    4. \u0130\u00e7sel ve D\u0131\u015fsal Olan Aras\u0131ndaki Nedensellik Sorunu<\/strong>
      \n\u0130\u00e7sel olan\u0131n d\u0131\u015fsal olan \u00fczerindeki etkisi, klasik nedensellik anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131klanamaz. Bu durum, Kant\u2019\u0131n teorik akl\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131yla ilgili ele\u015ftirilerine ve Hume\u2019un nedensellik \u015f\u00fcphecili\u011fine dayan\u0131r. Kuantum fizi\u011fi bu meseleye yeni imk\u00e2nlar sunsa da, \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm hen\u00fcz tamamlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/li>\n
    5. \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Ahlaki Sorumluluk<\/strong>
      \nEylemde bulunan \u00f6znenin i\u00e7sel bir nedeni yoksa ahlaki sorumlulu\u011fun anlam\u0131 kalmaz. \u00c7itil, Kant\u2019\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve \u00f6dev ili\u015fkisini tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r ve i\u00e7sel olan\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcr nedenselli\u011fi d\u0131\u015fsal olanda nas\u0131l bir etki yaratabilir sorusuna cevap arar.<\/li>\n
    6. Tanr\u0131, Ruh ve Mutluluk: Kant\u2019\u0131n Post\u00fclatlar\u0131<\/strong>
      \nKant\u2019a g\u00f6re ahlaki eylemin m\u00fcmk\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck, ruhun \u00f6l\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmelidir. Bu post\u00fclatlar bilgi de\u011fil, inan\u00e7 d\u00fczeyinde savunulur. \u00c7itil, Kant\u2019\u0131n bu arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131 mant\u0131ksal ve metafiziksel ba\u011flamda ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde yorumlar.<\/li>\n
    7. Modern Fizik ve Yeni Bir Metafizi\u011fin \u0130mk\u00e2n\u0131<\/strong>
      \nKuantum fizi\u011fi, i\u00e7sel olan\u0131n d\u0131\u015fsal olanda etkisini istatistiksel modellerle ifade edebilse de, teorik olarak bu ili\u015fkiyi hen\u00fcz a\u00e7\u0131klayamaz. \u00c7itil, bu a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n teorik fizik ve klasik metafizi\u011fin yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilece\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrer.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. Sonu\u00e7<\/strong>
        \nAyhan \u00c7itil\u2019in 18. semineri, klasik metafizi\u011fin \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f bilimsel geli\u015fmelerle yeniden kurulabilece\u011fini g\u00f6steren bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce prati\u011fi sunar. \u0130\u00e7sel olan\u0131n d\u0131\u015fsal olandaki etkisini \u00e7eli\u015fkiye d\u00fc\u015fmeden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnme imk\u00e2n\u0131, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck, ahlak ve sorumluluk gibi temel meselelerin felsefi zemini olarak \u00f6nerilir. Bu seminer, Aristoteles\u00e7i d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin sadece tarihsel de\u011fil, \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f bir nazariyat i\u00e7in de vazge\u00e7ilmez oldu\u011funu kan\u0131tlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

         <\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong>
          \nThis seminar reconsiders the relationship between the internal and the external from Aristotelian metaphysical, phenomenological, epistemological, and cosmological perspectives. Ayhan \u00c7itil constructs a conceptual framework around \u201cselfhood,\u201d \u201cappearance,\u201d \u201cbeing-in-itself,\u201d \u201cspace,\u201d \u201ctime,\u201d and \u201ccausality,\u201d while engaging critically with Plato, Kant, Hume, and modern physics\u2014especially quantum theory. The seminar challenges classical substance metaphysics by confronting it with the problems of freedom, moral agency, and contemporary scientific frameworks.<\/li>\n
        2. Main Themes and Topics<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
            \n
          1. The Constitution of the Self and Being-in-Itself<\/strong>
            \nThe self arises through a gap established in relation to the being-in-itself. This gap allows for differentiation and reflexive awareness. At the core of this process lies the imaginative faculty (muhayyile<\/em>) as an active mental function that constitutes subjectivity.<\/li>\n
          2. Ontological Status of Space and Time<\/strong>
            \n\u00c7itil argues that space and time are not objects but paradoxical frameworks of thought. They must be conceived through the traces of zero and emptiness, which reveals them as contradictory yet necessary conditions for understanding and experience.<\/li>\n
          3. Appearance, Reality, and Manifestation<\/strong>
            \nBeing-in-itself manifests within three-dimensional reality. This manifestation is not its essence but a partial expression of it. \u00c7itil metaphorically describes this as \u201ca quilt spilling out\u201d\u2014a trace of the real that never fully reveals itself.<\/li>\n
          4. The Causality Problem Between Inner and Outer<\/strong>
            \nClassical models of causality cannot account for how the internal affects the external. This opens a discussion based on Kant\u2019s critique of pure reason and Hume\u2019s skepticism of causality. Although quantum physics offers statistical frameworks, it does not yet provide a complete theoretical resolution.<\/li>\n
          5. Freedom and Moral Responsibility<\/strong>
            \nWithout an internal cause, moral responsibility collapses. \u00c7itil revisits Kant\u2019s linkage between freedom and moral obligation, and questions how inner causality can produce real effects in the empirical world\u2014a question central to both ethics and metaphysics.<\/li>\n
          6. God, Soul, and Happiness: Kant\u2019s Postulates<\/strong>
            \nAccording to Kant, moral action presupposes the ideas of freedom, the immortality of the soul, and the existence of God\u2014not as knowledge, but as necessary postulates of practical reason. \u00c7itil provides a detailed examination of these postulates and their metaphysical implications.<\/li>\n
          7. Modern Physics and the Possibility of a New Metaphysics<\/strong>
            \nQuantum theory offers probabilistic models to describe the influence of inner states on outer phenomena but lacks a full theoretical explanation. \u00c7itil proposes that such an explanation requires a reconstruction of both theoretical physics and classical metaphysical concepts.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
              \n
            1. Conclusion<\/strong>
              \nAyhan \u00c7itil\u2019s 18th seminar presents a philosophical practice that seeks to rebuild classical metaphysics in dialogue with contemporary scientific developments. The possibility of thinking the effect of the inner on the outer without contradiction is framed as a foundation for re-grounding freedom, morality, and responsibility. Ultimately, the seminar affirms the enduring relevance of Aristotelian metaphysics in confronting the challenges of modern thought.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

               <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 18. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4847","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4847"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4847\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4848,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4847\/revisions\/4848"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}