{"id":4871,"date":"2025-05-05T12:58:52","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:58:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=4871"},"modified":"2025-05-05T12:58:52","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T09:58:52","slug":"ayhan-citil-aristoteles-metafizik-okumalari-30-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ayhan-citil-aristoteles-metafizik-okumalari-30-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 30. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 30. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ana Temalar:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Alt\u0131nc\u0131 Kitap ve Yeni Okuma S\u0131ralamas\u0131:<\/strong> Bu seminerde Aristoteles\u2019in Metafizik’inin alt\u0131nc\u0131 kitab\u0131 ele al\u0131n\u0131r. Hocan\u0131n \u00f6nerisiyle geleneksel s\u0131ralama yerine 2-3-4-1 \u015feklinde bir s\u0131ralama tercih edilir. Bu yap\u0131da \u00f6nce varl\u0131k ve ilinek tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131, ard\u0131ndan do\u011fruluk ve bilim tasnifi ele al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  2. \u0130linek (Araz) ve \u00d6z (Mahiyet) Ayr\u0131m\u0131:<\/strong> Aristoteles\u2019e g\u00f6re ilinekler (kazara y\u00fcklemler), bilimsel bilgiye konu olamaz; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc ne zorunludurlar ne de her zaman ortaya \u00e7\u0131karlar. \u00d6rne\u011fin, bir evin pembe panjurlu olmas\u0131 ya da yaz g\u00fcn\u00fcnde f\u0131rt\u0131na olmas\u0131 gibi durumlar ilinekseldir. Bu ba\u011flamda iline\u011fin varl\u0131kla ili\u015fkisi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r ve Platon\u2019un sofist ele\u015ftirisine g\u00f6nderme yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  3. Modern Mant\u0131kla A\u00e7\u0131klama Denemesi:<\/strong> \u0130linek-\u00f6z ili\u015fkisi, y\u00fcklemleme, zorunluluk ve olumsall\u0131k \u00fczerinden modern mant\u0131k (\u00f6zellikle modal mant\u0131k) kullan\u0131larak yeniden yorumlan\u0131r. \u201cZorunludur ki p ise q\u201d gibi yap\u0131lar \u00fczerinden sofistlerin hatal\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131mlar\u0131 ele al\u0131n\u0131r ve Aristoteles\u2019in ayr\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n tutarl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulan\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  4. Leibniz ve Analitik Y\u00fcklem Tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131:<\/strong> Leibniz\u2019in t\u00fcm do\u011fru y\u00fcklemlerin \u00f6zne i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu fikri tart\u0131\u015fmaya dahil edilir. Ayhan \u00c7itil, bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 birey ve ilinek ili\u015fkisi ba\u011flam\u0131nda sorgular ve bireyin sahip oldu\u011fu t\u00fcm y\u00fcklemlerin toplam\u0131 m\u0131 oldu\u011fu sorusunu g\u00fcndeme ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  5. Metafizik, Madde ve \u0130lahi \u0130rade Problemi:<\/strong> Aristoteles\u2019in maddeyi iline\u011fin zemini olarak g\u00f6rmesine dair ele\u015ftirel bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131l\u0131r. Bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin ilahiyatla ili\u015fkisi, \u00f6zellikle \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck, zorunluluk, Tanr\u0131’n\u0131n bilgisi ve m\u00fckellefiyet gibi konular \u00fczerinden yo\u011fun bi\u00e7imde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. \u0130lahiyat\u0131n temel sorusu olarak, \u201cBir birey ne zaman kendisidir?\u201d sorusu \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131kar.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong> Bu seminerde Aristoteles\u2019in ilinek anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcklemleme, \u00f6z, birey, modalite ve ilahiyat ili\u015fkileri \u00e7ok katmanl\u0131 \u015fekilde ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tanr\u0131, \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve birey sorumlulu\u011fu ekseninde hem klasik hem modern d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce sorgulan\u0131rken, metafizi\u011fin temel problemlerinin bug\u00fcne ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 sa\u011flan\u0131r.<\/p>\n

    Main Themes:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Book VI and a New Reading Order:<\/strong>
      \nThis seminar focuses on Book VI of Aristotle’s Metaphysics<\/em>. The instructor adopts an alternative reading order\u20142-3-4-1\u2014rather than the traditional sequence. In this structure, the discussion begins with being and accident, followed by truth and the classification of sciences.<\/li>\n
    2. Distinction between Accident and Essence:<\/strong>
      \nAccording to Aristotle, accidents (incidental predicates) are not suitable objects of scientific knowledge, as they are neither necessary nor universally present. Examples such as a house with pink shutters or a thunderstorm on a summer day illustrate the contingent nature of accidents. The relation between accident and being is explored, with a reference to Plato\u2019s critique of sophists.<\/li>\n
    3. Interpretation through Modern Logic:<\/strong>
      \nThe accident\u2013essence distinction is revisited through the lens of modern logic, particularly modal logic, involving necessity and contingency. Structures such as \u201cnecessarily, if p then q\u201d are used to critique sophistic fallacies and to reaffirm Aristotle\u2019s consistent differentiation between essential and accidental attributes.<\/li>\n
    4. Leibniz and the Analytic Predicate Theory:<\/strong>
      \nLeibniz\u2019s idea that all true predicates are contained in the subject is introduced and questioned. \u00c7itil examines whether a subject is merely the sum of all its predicates and problematizes the individuality of beings based on this analytic framework.<\/li>\n
    5. Metaphysics, Matter, and the Problem of Divine Will:<\/strong>
      \nA critical assessment is made of Aristotle\u2019s view of matter as the ground of accidents. This leads to theological inquiries involving divine knowledge, human responsibility, freedom, and necessity. The central theological question posed is: \u201cWhen does an individual truly become themselves?\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Conclusion:<\/strong>
      \nThis seminar offers a multi-layered analysis of Aristotle\u2019s notion of accident and its implications for predication, essence, individuality, modality, and theology. By connecting questions of divine knowledge, freedom, and responsibility to classical metaphysics, \u00c7itil reintroduces ancient philosophical problems into contemporary discourse.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      AYHAN \u00c7\u0130T\u0130L: AR\u0130STOTELES, METAF\u0130Z\u0130K OKUMALARI 30. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Ana Temalar: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4871","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4871","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4871"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4871\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4872,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4871\/revisions\/4872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4871"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}