{"id":5234,"date":"2025-05-09T15:59:06","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T12:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5234"},"modified":"2025-05-09T15:59:21","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T12:59:21","slug":"ekrem-demirli-gazzaliel-munkiz-mined-dalal-5-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirli-gazzaliel-munkiz-mined-dalal-5-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE’D-DAL\u00c2L 5. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE’D-DAL\u00c2L 5. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bu seminerde Ekrem Demirli, Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin el-Munkiz mine\u2019d-dal\u00e2l adl\u0131 eserinin \u00f6zellikle filozoflar ele\u015ftirisi ba\u011flam\u0131nda ortaya koydu\u011fu felsefe kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 detayland\u0131rmakta, bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Teh\u00e2f\u00fct\u00fc\u2019l-Fel\u00e2sife ve \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Teh\u00e2f\u00fct\u00fc\u2019t-Teh\u00e2f\u00fct\u00fcyle mukayeseli olarak analiz etmektedir. Ayn\u0131 zamanda Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee’nin, felsefi bilginin do\u011fas\u0131, bireysellik problemi ve dini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye kar\u015f\u0131 entelekt\u00fcel tehditler gibi temel konulara dair tutumlar\u0131 incelenmektedir.<\/p>\n

Ana Temalar<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin Felsefeye Kar\u015f\u0131 Tavr\u0131 ve \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Ele\u015ftirisi:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Demirli, \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019ye y\u00f6neltti\u011fi \u201cfelsefi tutars\u0131zl\u0131k\u201d su\u00e7lamas\u0131na yer verir. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd, Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n\u0131n bilimsel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunurken, Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee filozoflar\u0131 temelsizlik ve \u00e7eli\u015fkiyle itham eder. Bu tart\u0131\u015fma, \u00f6zellikle Tanr\u0131-\u00e2lem ili\u015fkisi ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u201chud\u00fbs\u201d ve \u201cimk\u00e2n\u201d kavramlar\u0131 \u00fczerinden derinle\u015fir.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Bireysellik Problemi ve Tikel Varl\u0131klar:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Seminerde, tikellerin hakiki varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bireyselli\u011fin araz\u00ee yap\u0131s\u0131yla ge\u00e7icili\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019e g\u00f6re bireysellik felsefi olarak temellendirilemez; Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee ise bu bireyselli\u011fin din\u00ee m\u00fckellefiyet i\u00e7in zorunlu oldu\u011funu savunur.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Taklit Ele\u015ftirisi ve Felsefenin Otorite \u0130n\u015fas\u0131:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee, filozoflar\u0131n taklide dayal\u0131 bilgi \u00fcretimini ele\u015ftirirken, dinde peygamber otoritesine dayanan taklidin daha me\u015fru oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrer. Ona g\u00f6re felsefeciler Aristo ve Sokrat gibi isimlerin bilimsel otoritesini metafizi\u011fe izinsiz ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Teh\u00e2f\u00fct Kavram\u0131 ve Metafizi\u011fin Ele\u015ftirisi:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee, felsefenin en b\u00fcy\u00fck a\u00e7maz\u0131n\u0131 \u201cteh\u00e2f\u00fct\u201d yani \u00e7eli\u015fki olarak tan\u0131mlar. Ona g\u00f6re filozoflar aras\u0131nda birlik bulunmamas\u0131, onlar\u0131n y\u00f6ntemlerinin tutars\u0131z ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n temelsiz oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. \u0130slam \u015eehirlerinde Felsef\u00ee D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin Etkisi:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Demirli, \u0130slam toplumlar\u0131nda \u0130slam\u2019\u0131n entelekt\u00fcel h\u00e2kimiyetinin san\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kadar g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin bu y\u00fczden bir muhalif gibi davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve felsefeyi savunan g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc \u00e7evrelere kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fccadele verdi\u011fini vurgular.<\/p>\n

            Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n

            Bu seminer, Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin felsefeye kar\u015f\u0131 geli\u015ftirdi\u011fi reddiyeci tutumu ve bu tutumun bilgi kuram\u0131 ve bireysellik gibi alanlara etkisini kapsaml\u0131 bi\u00e7imde i\u015fler. Metin, \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn ele\u015ftirileriyle birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek klasik kelam\u2013felsefe \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcncel felsefi anlamlar\u0131na da kap\u0131 aralamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

             <\/p>\n

            \u00a0Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n

            This seminar examines Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s anti-philosophical stance as articulated in al-Munqidh min al-\u1e0cal\u0101l, particularly in relation to his Tah\u0101fut al-Fal\u0101sifa and Ibn Rushd\u2019s Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut. Ekrem Demirli analyzes Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s critique of philosophical knowledge, focusing on issues such as the nature of intellection, the problem of individuality, and the threat posed by philosophy to religious thought.<\/p>\n

            Main Themes:<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s Opposition to Philosophy and Ibn Rushd\u2019s Critique<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              Demirli discusses Ibn Rushd\u2019s accusation that Ghaz\u0101l\u012b lacked philosophical coherence. While Ibn Rushd accuses Ghaz\u0101l\u012b of unscientific reasoning, Ghaz\u0101l\u012b denounces philosophers as self-contradictory. Their debate intensifies over the concepts of creation (\u1e25ud\u016bth) and possibility (imk\u0101n) within the God\u2013world relationship.<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The Problem of Individuality and Particulars<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                The seminar questions whether particulars truly exist and whether individuality, being accidental, can be philosophically grounded. Ibn Rushd denies its ultimate validity, whereas Ghaz\u0101l\u012b insists on individuality as a necessity for moral responsibility in religion.<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Critique of Imitation (Taql\u012bd) and the Construction of Philosophical Authority<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Ghaz\u0101l\u012b accuses philosophers of basing their metaphysics on blind imitation, attributing undue authority to figures like Aristotle and Socrates. He contrasts this with religious taql\u012bd, which is legitimized through prophetic authority and revelation.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The Concept of Tah\u0101fut and the Critique of Metaphysics<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    For Ghaz\u0101l\u012b, the central flaw of philosophy is tah\u0101fut\u2014incoherence. The lack of consensus among philosophers, he argues, reveals the instability of their methods and conclusions, undermining metaphysics as a reliable source of truth.<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. The Intellectual Status of Philosophy in Islamic Cities<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      Demirli notes that Islamic thought did not dominate Islamic societies as strongly as often assumed. Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s position is thus one of a dissident, confronting influential philosophical circles within the Islamic world.<\/p>\n

                      Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      This seminar provides a comprehensive reading of Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s refutation of philosophy and its implications for epistemology and individuality. It situates his arguments within the broader conflict between kal\u0101m and philosophy, while also examining how Ibn Rushd\u2019s critiques reframe this intellectual tension for later Islamic and modern discourse.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE’D-DAL\u00c2L 5. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5234","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5234"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5236,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5234\/revisions\/5236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}