{"id":5237,"date":"2025-05-09T16:00:08","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T13:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5237"},"modified":"2025-05-09T16:00:08","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T13:00:08","slug":"ekrem-demirli-gazzaliel-munkiz-mined-dalal-6-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirli-gazzaliel-munkiz-mined-dalal-6-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE&#8217;D-DAL\u00c2L 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE&#8217;D-DAL\u00c2L 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminerde Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin el-Munk\u0131z mine\u2019d-dal\u00e2l adl\u0131 eserindeki \u201cfilozoflara y\u00f6neltti\u011fi tutars\u0131zl\u0131k\u201d (te\u00e2f\u00fct) ele\u015ftirileri \u00fczerinden metafizik, do\u011fa anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131, Tanr\u0131-tikel ili\u015fkisinin imk\u00e2n\u0131 ve dini ilimlerin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ekrem Demirli\u2019nin de\u011ferlendirmesiyle, klasik \u0130slam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde kelam\u00ee ve felsef\u00ee yakla\u015f\u0131mlar aras\u0131ndaki temel ayr\u0131mlar, \u00f6zellikle Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin teklif (y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck) merkezli din anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda ele al\u0131n\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Te\u00e2f\u00fct Ele\u015ftirisi ve Metafizik Tart\u0131\u015fmalar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re metafizik, do\u011fa ve matematik gibi bilimlerden t\u00fcreyen sa\u011flam bir delil yap\u0131s\u0131na sahip de\u011fildir. Filozoflar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri ya \u00e7eli\u015fik ya da temelsizdir. Metafizik iddialar, matematik veya fizik bilimlerinin otoritesinden haks\u0131z yere g\u00fc\u00e7 al\u0131r. Bu nedenle, dinin temel hakikatleri ile felsef\u00ee iddialar aras\u0131nda ciddi bir ayr\u0131m g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Determinizm, Do\u011fa ve Mizac Ele\u015ftirisi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee, tabiat\u00e7\u0131 ve metafizik\u00e7i filozoflar\u0131n do\u011fa (tabi\u00ee), miza\u00e7 ve unsurlar gibi kavramlar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla insan\u0131n ahlak\u0131n\u0131 ve akl\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen zorunlu yap\u0131lar kurmas\u0131n\u0131 reddeder. Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n tikellerle do\u011frudan ili\u015fkisini ink\u00e2r eder ve yaratma fiilini pasifle\u015ftirir. Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n m\u00fcdahalesi s\u00fcreklidir ve her tikel varl\u0131k bu m\u00fcdahalenin \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Matematik Bilgisi ve Dini Tehlike<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Matematik biliminin delillerindeki a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k, halk nezdinde filozoflara kar\u015f\u0131 bir hayranl\u0131k do\u011furmakta ve bu hayranl\u0131k metafizik iddialara da yay\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee bu noktada uyar\u0131da bulunur: Matematikten etkilenip dini inkar eden bir\u00e7ok ki\u015fi olmu\u015ftur. Bu nedenle bu ilimlere y\u00f6nelimin s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini savunur.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>Dini ve D\u0131\u015f\u0131 Olan\u0131n Ayr\u0131m\u0131: Teklif Merkezli Epistemoloji<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re bir bilginin dini say\u0131labilmesi, insan\u0131 Allah\u2019a yakla\u015ft\u0131ran bir teklif i\u00e7ermesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Teklif, dinin epistemolojik ve ontolojik merkezidir. Faydas\u0131z bilgi, yani amel do\u011furmayan bilgi, din\u00ee olarak anlaml\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bu anlay\u0131\u015f, \u0130mam M\u00e2t\u00fcr\u00eed\u00ee ve erken d\u00f6nem sahabe yakla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131yla da \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li><strong>Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin Konumu ve D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnsel \u00c7at\u0131\u015fmalar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee, kendi d\u00f6neminde egemen bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcr de\u011fildir. Farkl\u0131 ekollerle m\u00fccadele h\u00e2linde, ortada bir pozisyon almaktad\u0131r. Bu, hem felsefi otoritelerle hem de din\u00ee muhafazak\u00e2r \u00e7evrelerle \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 do\u011furmu\u015ftur. Onun temel derdi, Tanr\u0131 ile insan aras\u0131nda dinamik ve do\u011frudan bir ili\u015fkiyi savunmakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminerde Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin filozoflara y\u00f6nelik ele\u015ftirileri ba\u011flam\u0131nda metafizik, do\u011fa, ak\u0131l ve teklif kavramlar\u0131 derinlemesine tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin Tanr\u0131-tikel ili\u015fkisinde s\u00fcrekli m\u00fcdahaleyi esas alan yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, hem do\u011fa bilimlerine hem de felsefi otoriteye kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir kelam\u00ee savunma \u00f6rne\u011fidir.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This seminar explores Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s critique of metaphysics and philosophers through the concept of \u201cincoherence\u201d (tah\u0101fut), focusing on issues such as nature, divine agency, the relationship between God and particulars, and the limits of religious knowledge. Ekrem Demirli evaluates the fundamental differences between philosophical and kal\u0101m-based approaches, especially in light of Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s theology centered on moral responsibility (takl\u012bf).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Main Themes and Headings<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Critique of Incoherence and Metaphysical Claims<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>According to Ghaz\u0101l\u012b, metaphysics lacks the rigorous foundations of natural sciences and mathematics. Philosophers\u2019 claims are either contradictory or speculative. Their metaphysical conclusions borrow illegitimately from the clarity of other sciences. Thus, a strict boundary must be maintained between religious truths and philosophical assumptions.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Determinism, Nature, and the Rejection of Fixed Dispositions<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Ghaz\u0101l\u012b rejects the deterministic worldview of natural philosophers who argue that character and intellect are shaped unavoidably by nature, temperament, and elements. This framework denies God\u2019s direct relationship with particulars. Ghaz\u0101l\u012b insists that divine intervention is continuous and every particular entity is a product of this ongoing act of creation.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Mathematical Knowledge and Its Religious Danger<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Ghaz\u0101l\u012b warns that the clarity of mathematical knowledge often leads to undue admiration for philosophers, which then extends to their metaphysical beliefs. He argues that many people lose their religious faith due to this confusion, advocating caution in approaching these disciplines.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>The Criterion of Religious Knowledge: Takl\u012bf-Centered Epistemology<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>For Ghaz\u0101l\u012b, knowledge is considered religious only if it draws one closer to God through moral obligation (takl\u012bf). This criterion becomes the epistemological and ontological center of religion. Knowledge that does not lead to ethical action is meaningless from a religious standpoint, aligning with early M\u0101tur\u012bd\u012b and companion-based perspectives.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li><strong>Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s Position and Intellectual Tensions<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Ghaz\u0101l\u012b was not an uncontested authority in his time. He positioned himself between competing traditions, often in conflict with both philosophical elites and conservative religious circles. His main concern was to uphold a dynamic and direct relationship between God and humanity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This seminar discusses Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s critique of philosophers with respect to metaphysics, nature, reason, and the doctrine of moral responsibility. His emphasis on divine agency in the world offers a robust theological response to deterministic and speculative philosophies, reaffirming kal\u0101m\u2019s relevance as a spiritual and intellectual defense.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: GAZZ\u00c2L\u00ce,el-MUNK\u0130Z M\u0130NE&#8217;D-DAL\u00c2L 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5237","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5237"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5237\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5238,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5237\/revisions\/5238"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}