{"id":5308,"date":"2025-05-09T19:29:05","date_gmt":"2025-05-09T16:29:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5308"},"modified":"2025-05-09T19:29:05","modified_gmt":"2025-05-09T16:29:05","slug":"ekrem-demirliibnul-arabifutuhat-i-mekkiyye-14-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirliibnul-arabifutuhat-i-mekkiyye-14-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130,\u0130BN\u00dc&#8217;L-ARAB\u00ce:F\u00dcT\u00dbH\u00c2T-I MEKK\u0130YYE 14. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130,\u0130BN\u00dc&#8217;L-ARAB\u00ce:F\u00dcT\u00dbH\u00c2T-I MEKK\u0130YYE 14. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminer, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee&#8217;nin F\u00fct\u00fbh\u00e2t-\u0131 Mekkiyye adl\u0131 eserinde n\u00fcb\u00fcvvet, ak\u0131l ve felsefe aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcmler \u00fczerine kuruludur. Demirli, n\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin bilgi kayna\u011f\u0131 olarak metafizik sistemlerdeki yerini, \u00f6zellikle Farab\u00ee, \u0130bn S\u00een\u00e2 ve klasik \u0130slam filozoflar\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca ser\u00fc-s\u00fcl\u00fbk (manevi yolculuk) ba\u011flam\u0131nda peygamberli\u011fin gereklili\u011fi ve do\u011frudan Tanr\u0131\u2019ya ula\u015fman\u0131n imk\u00e2n\u0131 sorgulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Ak\u0131l\u2013Din\u2013Felsefe \u0130li\u015fkisi ve Bilgi Kayna\u011f\u0131 Olarak Varl\u0131k:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee&#8217;nin ontolojik-epistemolojik yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla bilgi ve varl\u0131k aras\u0131ndaki dairesel ili\u015fki a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131r: \u201cBilgi, varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dan gezilmesi; varl\u0131k, bilginin yukar\u0131dan gezilmesidir.\u201d Varl\u0131kla gelen yolculuk, bilgiyle d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f yoludur. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede insandaki i\u00e7sel g\u00fcd\u00fclerin Tanr\u0131\u2019ya y\u00f6neldi\u011fi ve bu y\u00f6nelimin felsefi olarak izah edilebildi\u011fi ifade edilir.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Halifelik ve \u0130nsan-\u0131 K\u00e2mil:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u0130nsan varl\u0131k olarak yetkinle\u015fti\u011finde Tanr\u0131\u2019ya benzer h\u00e2le gelir; bu kemal hali halifelik olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131r. Halifelik siyasi de\u011fil, ahlaki ve metafizik bir kategori olarak a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131r. \u201cEl-insan bi\u2019l-fiil\u201d (fiil h\u00e2lindeki insan) kavram\u0131, insan-\u0131 k\u00e2mil ile e\u015fde\u011fer tutulur.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>N\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin Kayna\u011f\u0131: Tahsis mi, \u0130ktisap m\u0131?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Demirli, n\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin felsefi ve dini temellerini tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re Tanr\u0131 inanc\u0131 bedahetle bilinir, bu y\u00fczden n\u00fcb\u00fcvvet Tanr\u0131 bilgisinin kayna\u011f\u0131 de\u011fildir. As\u0131l sorun, n\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin zorunlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Peygamber, hakikati bilen biri midir, yoksa yaln\u0131zca ileten midir? Felsefi gelenekte n\u00fcb\u00fcvvet, filozofun muhayyile g\u00fcc\u00fcyle hakikati halka iletmesi \u015feklinde tasarlan\u0131rken, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee n\u00fcb\u00fcvveti Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n do\u011frudan tahsisi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>\u015eehir, K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve N\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin Toplumsal Anlam\u0131:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re insanl\u0131k Tanr\u0131\u2019y\u0131 ve n\u00fcb\u00fcvveti tabiat\u0131 gere\u011fi tan\u0131r. Peygamberin g\u00f6revi, zaten i\u00e7sel olarak bilinen hakikati d\u0131\u015fsalla\u015ft\u0131rmak ve topluma uygun dilde sunmakt\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda peygamber ile filozof aras\u0131nda y\u00f6ntem fark\u0131 oldu\u011fu vurgulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li><strong>Vahiy Dili ve Sembolizm:<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>N\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin dili, muhayyileye dayal\u0131 sembolik bir dildir. Bu dil, halk\u0131 hakikate ula\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in gereklidir. Filozof soyut hakikati anlar, fakat halk\u0131n anlayaca\u011f\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ifade edemez; bu nedenle n\u00fcb\u00fcvvet gereklidir. N\u00fcb\u00fcvvet, bir \u201cku\u015f dili\u201d olarak tan\u0131mlan\u0131r ve dini anlamak i\u00e7in bu dilin \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminerde \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin n\u00fcb\u00fcvvet teorisi \u00fczerinden \u0130slam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesindeki en temel ayr\u0131m, yani felsefenin iktisapla n\u00fcb\u00fcvveti a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile tasavvufun tahsise dayal\u0131 yorumu tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. Demirli, n\u00fcb\u00fcvvetin akla indirgenemeyecek bir ilahi se\u00e7im oldu\u011funu, din-felsefe ayr\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n da bu kabul ya da ret \u00fczerinden \u015fekillendi\u011fini ortaya koyar.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This seminar focuses on the discussions in Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s al-Fut\u016b\u1e25\u0101t al-Makkiyya regarding the relationship between prophecy (nubuwwa), reason, and philosophy. Ekrem Demirli analyzes the metaphysical place of prophethood as a source of knowledge, particularly through a comparison with thinkers like al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Ibn S\u012bn\u0101. The session also questions the necessity of prophecy and whether direct access to God is possible without it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Main Themes and Headings<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Reason\u2013Religion\u2013Philosophy and Being as a Source of Knowledge<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s ontological-epistemological model is introduced through the idea that \u201cknowledge is the descent through being, and being is the ascent through knowledge.\u201d The journey through being culminates in a return through knowledge. Human nature is innately directed toward God, and this orientation can be philosophically described.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Caliphate and the Perfect Human (al-Ins\u0101n al-K\u0101mil)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>When the human being actualizes perfection, they resemble the Divine. This perfected state is termed caliphate, understood not politically but as a moral and metaphysical reality. The phrase al-ins\u0101n bi\u2019l-fi\u02bfl (&#8220;the human in act&#8221;) is equated with the perfect human.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>The Source of Prophethood: Designation or Acquisition?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Demirli explores the theological and philosophical bases of prophecy. For Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b, belief in God is immediate and intuitive, hence prophecy is not its origin. The real issue is whether prophecy is necessary. While philosophy sees the prophet as someone who translates truth via imagination, Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b sees prophecy as a direct divine appointment (ta\u1e25\u1e63\u012b\u1e63), not a product of intellectual effort.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>City, Culture, and the Social Function of Prophecy<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>According to Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b, humanity recognizes God and prophecy by nature. The prophet\u2019s task is to externalize what is already internally known and present it in a language accessible to the community. The difference between prophet and philosopher lies in their respective methods.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"5\">\n<li><strong>Prophetic Language and Symbolism<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Prophetic language is symbolic and imaginative, necessary for conveying truth to the masses. While the philosopher may grasp abstract truths, they fail to express them in relatable terms. Prophecy becomes essential and is likened to a \u201clanguage of the birds,\u201d a symbolic system that must be decoded for true religious understanding.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Through Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s theory of prophecy, this seminar highlights the major divide in Islamic thought: philosophy explains prophethood through acquisition, while Sufism views it as divine selection. Demirli underscores that prophecy cannot be reduced to reason and that the religion\u2013philosophy distinction hinges on this fundamental disagreement.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130,\u0130BN\u00dc&#8217;L-ARAB\u00ce:F\u00dcT\u00dbH\u00c2T-I MEKK\u0130YYE 14. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5308","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5308"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5308\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5309,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5308\/revisions\/5309"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}