<\/p>\n
ERMAN G\u00d6REN, HOMEROS OKUMALARI:IL\u0130AS 4. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Dersin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n Bu seminer, “Homeros Sorunu” olarak bilinen metin tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131, tarihsel geli\u015fimi ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc k\u00fclt\u00fcr ba\u011flam\u0131nda Ilias\u2019\u0131n olu\u015fum s\u00fcrecini ele al\u0131r. Erman G\u00f6ren, Homeros\u2019un kimli\u011fi, metnin yaz\u0131l\u0131 hale gelme s\u00fcreci, icra bi\u00e7imleri ve 18. y\u00fczy\u0131ldan itibaren geli\u015fen filolojik tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 kapsaml\u0131 bi\u00e7imde aktar\u0131r. Seminer, \u00f6zellikle s\u00f6zl\u00fc gelenek teorisiyle modern Homeros ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n\u0131n geldi\u011fi noktay\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r ve Perry\u2013Lord yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla Foley\u2019in katk\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek epik \u015fiirin icrasal yap\u0131s\u0131na dair derinlemesine bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmleme sunar.<\/p>\n Ana Temalar<\/strong><\/p>\n Seminer, Homeros\u2019un tarihsel bir \u015fah\u0131s olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sorgular. August Wolf\u2019un 1795 tarihli \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131yla ba\u015flayan tart\u0131\u015fmada Homeros\u2019un bir gelenek \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc, s\u00f6zl\u00fc bir miras\u0131n aktar\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilir. Bu fikir, modern Homeros ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n\u0131n temelini olu\u015fturur.<\/p>\n Milman Perry ve \u00f6\u011frencisi Albert Lord\u2019un tespit etti\u011fi \u00fczere, Ilias gibi epik metinler s\u00f6zl\u00fc icra yoluyla \u015fekillenmi\u015ftir. Lord\u2019un S\u0131rp \u201cGuslar\u201d gelene\u011fi \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar, Homeros metninin \u00e7ok formlu, de\u011fi\u015fken ve canl\u0131 bir icra \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc oldu\u011funu g\u00f6sterir.<\/p>\n Metnin yaz\u0131l\u0131 hale gelmesiyle birlikte Atina\u2019da Panathenaia \u015fenliklerinde n\u00f6betle\u015fe okunan icra bi\u00e7imi do\u011far. Bu durum, icran\u0131n daralmas\u0131na ve metnin ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yava\u015flamas\u0131na neden olur; b\u00f6ylece metin sabitle\u015fir ve yorumlanabilir bir nesne haline gelir.<\/p>\n M.\u00d6. 150\u2019de Aristarkhos\u2019un \u015ferhleriyle metin, en yo\u011fun bi\u00e7imde d\u00fczenlenir. Bu, ak\u0131\u015fkan icra gelene\u011finin en \u00e7ok kesintiye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktad\u0131r. Ancak Aristarkhos metne son bi\u00e7imini verirken bile icra miras\u0131n\u0131n izlerini ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/p>\n John Miles Foley\u2019nin \u201coral derived text\u201d yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, metni a\u011f\u0131zdan t\u00fcretilmi\u015f ve icra ile bi\u00e7imlenmi\u015f bir yap\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirir. Foley, her okurun bir t\u00fcr icrac\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve bu bilincin metnin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in elzem oldu\u011funu savunur.<\/p>\n Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n Seminer, Ilias\u2019\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir metin olarak de\u011fil, s\u00f6zl\u00fc gelene\u011fin bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc ve s\u00fcrekli yeniden icra edilen bir yap\u0131 olarak kavrar. Homeros \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131, sadece filolojik de\u011fil, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel ve antropolojik olarak da s\u00f6zl\u00fc k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn insanl\u0131k tarihindeki merkez\u00ee rol\u00fcn\u00fc anlamaya yard\u0131mc\u0131 olur. Bu ba\u011flamda, Homeros okumak insanla\u015fmak i\u00e7in bir imk\u00e2n olarak sunulur.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n This seminar explores the \u201cHomeric Question,\u201d focusing on the historical development of scholarly debates surrounding Homer\u2019s identity, the oral origins of the Ilias, and the transition from oral performance to textual standardization. Erman G\u00f6ren analyzes the evolution of Homeric studies from the 18th century onward, emphasizing the contributions of Milman Perry, Albert Lord, and John Miles Foley. The seminar critically examines how oral tradition shaped the epic form and how its performative roots continue to influence modern interpretations.<\/p>\n Main Themes<\/strong><\/p>\n The seminar questions whether Homer was a historical individual or a symbolic figure representing a tradition. The modern debate begins with Friedrich August Wolf\u2019s 1795 thesis that Homer was not a solitary author but the culmination of a collective oral tradition.<\/p>\n Perry and Lord\u2019s fieldwork on South Slavic epic poets (guslars) demonstrated that epics like the Ilias were composed and transmitted through performance. Their findings suggest that Homer\u2019s poetry was dynamic, flexible, and improvised rather than fixed.<\/p>\n The transition to a written text coincided with the institutionalization of recitations at the Panathenaic festivals in Athens. This led to a reduction in improvisational flexibility, slowing the performance pace and fixing the text into a more stable and interpretable form.<\/p>\n By the 2nd century BCE, Aristarchus\u2019 scholia represented the most systematic attempt to organize and clarify the Homeric text. Although he finalized its form, traces of the oral and performative legacy remain visible even in his version.<\/p>\n John Miles Foley\u2019s \u201coral-derived text\u201d theory views the Ilias not as a static work but as one shaped by the memory and voice of its reciters. According to Foley, every reader becomes a kind of performer, reactivating the poem\u2019s layered oral memory through engagement.<\/p>\n Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n This seminar emphasizes that the Ilias should be approached not merely as a literary artifact, but as a living product of oral tradition. Studying Homer involves understanding humanity\u2019s broader relationship with speech, memory, and collective cultural expression. In this light, reading Homer becomes a way of becoming more human.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ERMAN G\u00d6REN, HOMEROS OKUMALARI:IL\u0130AS 4. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Dersin Amac\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5322","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5322"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5322\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5323,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5322\/revisions\/5323"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n