{"id":5579,"date":"2025-05-13T16:59:10","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T13:59:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5579"},"modified":"2025-05-13T16:59:10","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T13:59:10","slug":"ekrem-demirli-fususul-hikem-okumalari-58-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirli-fususul-hikem-okumalari-58-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, FUS\u00dbSU’L-H\u0130KEM OKUMALARI 58. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, FUS\u00dbSU’L-H\u0130KEM OKUMALARI 58. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bu seminer, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin isim ve s\u0131fat teorisi \u00fczerinden geli\u015ftirdi\u011fi metafizik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi inceler. \u00d6zellikle E\u015f\u2019ar\u00ee ve Mutezile kel\u00e2m ekollerinin s\u0131fat anlay\u0131\u015flar\u0131yla giri\u015fti\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmalar ba\u011flam\u0131nda, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin ilah\u00ee isimleri \u201cnisbet\u201d (ili\u015fki) olarak yorumlamas\u0131, Tanr\u0131\u2013\u00e2lem ili\u015fkisini dinamik bir yap\u0131ya kavu\u015fturur. Demirli, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131n zorunlulu\u011fu, merhamet, ayn\u00fc\u2019s-s\u00e2bite ve insan\u0131n Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n isimlerine mazhar olu\u015fu gibi meseleleri \u00e7ok katmanl\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde ele al\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ana Temalar ve Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Kel\u00e2m\u00ee A\u00e7maz ve \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin M\u00fcdahalesi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Klasik kel\u00e2m, s\u0131fatlar\u0131 kabul ya da reddetme ikilemiyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131yad\u0131r. \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee bu ikilemi a\u015farak s\u0131fatlar\u0131 sabit varl\u0131klar de\u011fil, ili\u015fkisel boyutlar olarak tan\u0131mlar ve bu yolla tevhidi bozmadan \u00e7oklu\u011fu m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131lar.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. \u0130simlerden Yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015fa: \u0130li\u015fkisel Ontoloji<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u0130lah\u00ee isimler, yaln\u0131zca Tanr\u0131\u2019y\u0131 anlatmaz; varl\u0131\u011fa ta\u015f\u0131nmak, tezah\u00fcr etmek ister. \u00d6rne\u011fin \u201cer-Rezz\u00e2k\u201d ismi, r\u0131z\u0131klanan bir varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerektirir. Bu ba\u011flamda yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f, ilah\u00ee isimlerin zorunlu bir tezah\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f ve Zorunluluk Problemi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n rahmetini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirme iste\u011finden do\u011far. Ancak bu durum, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n iradesinin zorunlulu\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fmesi gibi bir paradoks yarat\u0131r: Tanr\u0131 diler mi, yoksa mecbur mu kal\u0131r?<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Ayn\u00fc\u2019s-S\u00e2bite Teorisinin Krizi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Ezelde sabit olan hakikatler (ayn\u00fc\u2019s-s\u00e2bite), Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n yaratma eylemini s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131yorsa, o h\u00e2lde ilah\u00ee kudret nas\u0131l \u00f6zg\u00fcrd\u00fcr? Bu teori, ilerleyen d\u00f6nemlerde \u0130mam Rabb\u00e2n\u00ee gibi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrlerce terk edilecektir.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. \u0130lah\u00ee Rahmet ve \u0130nsan Kimli\u011fi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Tanr\u0131, rahmetini kendi \u00fczerine vacip k\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130nsan da bu rahmetin mazhar\u0131 olarak yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla insan, ilah\u00ee isimlerin en kapsaml\u0131 tecellig\u00e2h\u0131d\u0131r; varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n gayesi, bu isimlerin a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Felsef\u00ee ve Kel\u00e2m\u00ee Sonu\u00e7lar<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin sistemi, klasik kel\u00e2m\u0131 a\u015fan bir derinlik sunsa da yeni metafizik problemleri de beraberinde getirir. Zorunluluk, imk\u00e2n, kudret ve \u015fuur gibi meselelerde sistemin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 yeniden tart\u0131\u015fmaya a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n

              Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Bu seminer, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin ilah\u00ee isimler ve yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f hakk\u0131ndaki \u00f6zg\u00fcn yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131, kel\u00e2m\u00ee tart\u0131\u015fmalarla mukayese ederek analiz eder. Sabit s\u0131fatlardan ili\u015fkiselli\u011fe ge\u00e7i\u015f, hem yarat\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131 hem de Tanr\u0131\u2013insan ili\u015fkisini yeniden tan\u0131mlar. Ancak bu yeni yakla\u015f\u0131m, beraberinde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi gereken derin metafizik sorular da ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/p>\n

               <\/p>\n

              Seminar Objective and Content<\/strong><\/p>\n

              This seminar analyzes Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s metaphysical theology by exploring the concept of divine names and attributes as relational constructs rather than static entities. It examines how Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b transcends the dichotomy between Ash\u02bfarite and Mu\u02bftazilite theological models by proposing a theory where divine names are understood as dynamic relations (nisba), linking God to the world and to humanity. The aim is to show how this reinterpretation reshapes our understanding of existence, creation, and divine mercy.<\/p>\n

              Key Themes and Topics<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. Theological Deadlock and Ibn al-<\/strong>\u02bf<\/strong>Arab<\/strong>\u012b\u2019<\/strong>s Intervention<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Traditional kal\u0101m faces a binary impasse: either accept or reject divine attributes as real. Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b overcomes this by transforming names and attributes into relations, thus preserving divine unity without denying multiplicity.<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Relational Ontology: From Names to Creation<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Divine names are not merely self-referential but demand the existence of the cosmos to manifest. For instance, the name al-Razz\u0101q (the Provider) implies a created world to receive provision. This grounds creation in divine self-expression.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. Creation and the Problem of Necessary Existence<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s model redefines creation not as a temporal act but as a logical consequence of divine mercy. However, this leads to a metaphysical tension: if God must manifest mercy through creation, does this compromise His freedom?<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. The Crisis of A<\/strong>\u02bf<\/strong>y<\/strong>\u0101<\/strong>n al-Th<\/strong>\u0101<\/strong>bita (Immutable Archetypes)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      The theory of a\u02bfy\u0101n al-th\u0101bita\u2014preexistent, immutable essences\u2014poses a major challenge. If these archetypes are fixed, how can true novelty or divine will operate freely? This issue later prompts thinkers like Im\u0101m Rabb\u0101n\u012b to retreat from the theory altogether.<\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. Divine Mercy and Human Identity<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                        God creates out of mercy, which He renders obligatory upon Himself. This act grounds human identity: we exist because we are the loci of divine mercy. The human being becomes the mirror in which divine names unfold.<\/p>\n

                          \n
                        1. Philosophical and Theological Consequences<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                          The seminar concludes by emphasizing the metaphysical complexity introduced by Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s system. It both surpasses earlier theological frameworks and introduces new dilemmas regarding necessity, contingency, and divine will.<\/p>\n

                          Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

                          This seminar presents Ibn al-\u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s theology as a radical reconfiguration of Islamic metaphysics. By shifting the discussion from fixed attributes to dynamic relations, it opens a new path in understanding divine action, creation, and the role of the human being in the cosmic order. Yet, it also reveals new philosophical tensions that require continued reflection.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                          EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, FUS\u00dbSU’L-H\u0130KEM OKUMALARI 58. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5579","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5579"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5580,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5579\/revisions\/5580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}