{"id":5639,"date":"2025-05-13T18:36:13","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T15:36:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5639"},"modified":"2025-05-13T18:36:13","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T15:36:13","slug":"ekrem-demirli-sadreddin-konevi-tasavvuf-metafizigi-okumalari-7-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirli-sadreddin-konevi-tasavvuf-metafizigi-okumalari-7-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u00ce, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 7. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u00ce, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 7. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Seminerin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bu seminerde Sadreddin Konev\u00ee\u2019nin metafizik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde yer alan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc kaide detayl\u0131 bi\u00e7imde ele al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. \u0130kinci kaidenin devam\u0131 mahiyetindeki bu prensip, varl\u0131kta ayniyet ve gayriyet meselesi \u00fczerinden bir ayr\u0131\u015fma problemati\u011fi olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. Konev\u00ee\u2019nin \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee ile birlikte metafiziksel farkl\u0131la\u015fma meselesine getirdi\u011fi yakla\u015f\u0131m, klasik kel\u00e2m ve felsefe gelene\u011finden ayr\u0131larak a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ana temalar ve ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Ayniyet ve Gayriyet Problemi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Konev\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re bir \u015feyden b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle kendisine z\u0131t veya kendisiyle tamamen ayn\u0131 bir \u015fey meydana gelmez. Bu yakla\u015f\u0131m, Tanr\u0131\u2019dan \u00e7\u0131kan varl\u0131klar\u0131n ontolojik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc belirlemekte kullan\u0131l\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda totoloji (tahsil\u00fc\u2019l-h\u00e2s\u0131l) sorunu ele al\u0131n\u0131r ve metafiziksel farkl\u0131la\u015fma, \u201cara bir durum\u201d kavram\u0131 \u00fczerinden a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131r.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Sud\u00fbr Teorisinde Farkla\u015fma Meselesi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Sud\u00fbr teorisinin en \u00f6nemli sorunu olan ilk farkl\u0131la\u015fman\u0131n izah\u0131, ne tamamen ayn\u0131l\u0131k ne tamamen ba\u015fkal\u0131k \u00fczerinden temellendirilebilir. Konev\u00ee bu a\u00e7maz\u0131 \u201cne ayn\u0131d\u0131r ne gayr\u0131d\u0131r\u201d yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla a\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Bu, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019deki ayniyet ve gayriyetin paradoksal yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131r.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Varl\u0131k Mertebeleri, Tayy\u00fcn ve La Tayy\u00fcn<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Varl\u0131k, tayy\u00fcn (belirme) ve la tayy\u00fcn (belirmeme) aras\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmelidir. La tayy\u00fcn, bir mertebe de\u011fil, varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n bir hali olarak anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede bilgi, tecelli ve Tanr\u0131\u2013\u00e2lem ili\u015fkisi yeniden yorumlan\u0131r.<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Ahadiyet ve Vahidiyet ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin ahadiyet\u2013vahidiyet ayr\u0131m\u0131, birlik i\u00e7inde ayr\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamada merkezi rol oynar. Bu ikilik, mutlak birlikten farkl\u0131la\u015fmaya ge\u00e7i\u015fin imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Tecelli ve mazhar ili\u015fkisi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Konev\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re Tanr\u0131\u2019dan sadece bir tecell\u00ee (Nefes-i Rahman) zuhur eder, fakat mazharlar\u0131n (tecell\u00ee yans\u0131y\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n) farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, tecell\u00eeyi \u00e7e\u015fitlendirir. Tecell\u00ee, mazhar\u0131ndan h\u00fck\u00fcm al\u0131r; b\u00f6ylece Tanr\u0131 her varl\u0131kta farkl\u0131 bi\u00e7imlerde g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr, fakat tecell\u00ee asl\u0131nda birdir.<\/p>\n

            Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n

            Bu seminer, Konev\u00ee\u2019nin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc metafizik kaidesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ayniyet\u2013gayriyet, tecell\u00ee\u2013mazhar ve tayy\u00fcn problemlerini kapsaml\u0131 \u015fekilde tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 zor olan bu meseleler, \u0130bn\u00fc\u2019l-Arab\u00ee\u2019nin metafizi\u011fini daha derinlemesine kavramak i\u00e7in temel te\u015fkil eder. Konev\u00ee\u2019nin yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, kel\u00e2m\u0131n \u00f6rtt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sorunlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kararak metafizi\u011fin zorluklar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcr k\u0131lar.<\/p>\n

             <\/p>\n

             <\/p>\n

            Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n

            This seminar examines the third metaphysical principle in \u1e62adr al-D\u012bn al-Q\u016bnaw\u012b\u2019s thought in depth. As a continuation of the second principle, this axiom focuses on the metaphysical problem of differentiation through the concepts of identity (ayn\u012bya) and otherness (ghayr\u012bya). Q\u016bnaw\u012b\u2019s approach to metaphysical difference, developed alongside Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b, is analyzed as distinct from classical kal\u0101m and philosophical traditions.<\/p>\n

            Main Themes and Headings<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. The Problem of Identity and Otherness<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              According to Q\u016bnaw\u012b, something completely identical to itself or entirely opposed to itself cannot originate from itself. This notion is applied to define the ontological status of beings that proceed from God. The issue of tautology (ta\u1e25\u1e63\u012bl al-\u1e25\u0101\u1e63il) is addressed, and metaphysical differentiation is conceptualized through an intermediate zone\u2014neither total sameness nor absolute difference.<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The Issue of Differentiation in the Theory of Emanation<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                The most critical problem in emanation theory lies in explaining the first differentiation. This cannot be grounded in pure identity or complete otherness. Q\u016bnaw\u012b resolves this dilemma through a “neither identical nor different” approach, paralleling the paradoxical formulation found in Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s metaphysics.<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. Degrees of Being: Determination and Non-Determination<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  Being must be considered in terms of ta\u02bfayyun (determination) and l\u0101 ta\u02bfayyun (non-determination). The latter is not a level of being but rather a state of being. This perspective leads to renewed interpretations of knowledge, manifestation, and the God\u2013world relationship.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The Distinction between A<\/strong>\u1e25<\/strong>adiyya and W\u0101<\/strong>\u1e25<\/strong>idiyya<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s differentiation between a\u1e25adiyya (absolute unity) and w\u0101\u1e25idiyya (manifest unity) is central in explaining multiplicity within unity. This duality makes the transition from undivided unity to metaphysical differentiation intelligible<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. Manifestation and Its Receptacles (Maz\u0101hir)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      For Q\u016bnaw\u012b, there is only one divine manifestation (ta\u01e7all\u012b), the Breath of the Merciful (Nafas al-Ra\u1e25m\u0101n). However, the diversity of receptacles (maz\u0101hir) causes this singular manifestation to appear in multiple forms. Manifestation takes on the character of its locus, so although God appears differently in every being, the divine manifestation is essentially one.<\/p>\n

                      Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      Centered on Q\u016bnaw\u012b\u2019s third metaphysical axiom, this seminar thoroughly investigates the problems of identity and otherness, manifestation and receptacle, and determination. These difficult topics offer deeper insight into Ibn \u02bfArab\u012b\u2019s metaphysics. Q\u016bnaw\u012b\u2019s treatment exposes the tensions classical theology conceals and lays bare the profound difficulties inherent in metaphysical inquiry.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130: SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u00ce, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 7. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5639","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5639"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5641,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5639\/revisions\/5641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}