{"id":5870,"date":"2025-05-19T16:30:23","date_gmt":"2025-05-19T13:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5870"},"modified":"2025-05-19T16:30:23","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T13:30:23","slug":"esref-altas-razi-okumalari-muhassal-36-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/esref-altas-razi-okumalari-muhassal-36-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"E\u015eREF ALTA\u015e, R\u00c2Z\u0130 OKUMALARI: MUHASSAL 36. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>E\u015eREF ALTA\u015e, R\u00c2Z\u0130 OKUMALARI: MUHASSAL 36. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Dersin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminer, Fahreddin er-R\u00e2z\u00ee\u2019nin zorunlu varl\u0131k olarak Tanr\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n ispat\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda, \u201cvarl\u0131k\u201d kavram\u0131n\u0131n Tanr\u0131\u2019ya y\u00fcklenip y\u00fcklenemeyece\u011fi sorununu ele al\u0131r. Ard\u0131ndan il\u00e2h\u00ee s\u0131fatlar konusuna ge\u00e7ilerek \u00f6zellikle selb\u00ee s\u0131fatlar\u0131n mahiyeti, gerek\u00e7esi ve s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. R\u00e2z\u00ee, s\u0131fatlar konusunu Tanr\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n mahiyetine dair \u00fc\u00e7 farkl\u0131 ayr\u0131\u015fma modeli \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sistematik olarak inceler: zatla ayr\u0131\u015fma, s\u0131fatla ayr\u0131\u015fma ve ademi kay\u0131tla ayr\u0131\u015fma.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Tanr\u0131\u2019ya \u201cVard\u0131r\u201d Y\u00fckleminin Nispeti Tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Tanr\u0131\u2019ya \u201cvard\u0131r\u201d denilip denilemeyece\u011fi, bu y\u00fcklemenin Tanr\u0131\u2019y\u0131 di\u011fer varl\u0131klarla e\u015fit konuma m\u0131 getirdi\u011fi, yoksa ona yeni bir \u00f6zellik mi katt\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorunsalla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Mutezile\u2019nin \u201cmevcudiyet\u201di bir s\u0131fat saymas\u0131 ele\u015ftirilir. R\u00e2z\u00ee, Tanr\u0131\u2019ya varl\u0131k y\u00fcklemenin hem gereklili\u011fini hem de Tanr\u0131\u2019y\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn varl\u0131klardan ay\u0131ran \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc savunur.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n Mahiyetinin Ayr\u0131\u015fma Bi\u00e7imleri: \u00dc\u00e7 Felsef\u00ee Yakla\u015f\u0131m<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Seminerin merkezinde Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n mahiyetinin di\u011fer varl\u0131klardan nas\u0131l ayr\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusu yer al\u0131r. R\u00e2z\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re bu ayr\u0131\u015fma bizzat zat iledir. Ebu H\u00e2\u015fim\u2019e g\u00f6re s\u0131fatlar\u0131n gerektirdi\u011fi hallerle (dirilik, ilim, kudret, mevcudiyet) olur. \u0130bn S\u00een\u00e2 ise ayr\u0131\u015fman\u0131n ademi bir kay\u0131tla (yani varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahiyete ili\u015fmemesiyle) ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini savunur. R\u00e2z\u00ee bu son iki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe ele\u015ftiriler y\u00f6neltir.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Selb\u00ee S\u0131fatlar\u0131n Mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Gerek\u00e7eleri<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>R\u00e2z\u00ee, Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n cisim olmamas\u0131, yer kaplamamas\u0131, y\u00f6ns\u00fcz olu\u015fu gibi s\u0131fatlar\u0131n neden olumsuzlay\u0131c\u0131 (selb\u00ee) s\u0131fatlarla ifade edildi\u011fini tart\u0131\u015f\u0131r. Bu s\u0131fatlar\u0131n amac\u0131, hem Kur\u2019an\u2019daki tenzih ifadeleriyle uyum sa\u011flamak, hem de tarih boyunca Tanr\u0131\u2019ya izafe edilen eksik s\u0131fatlar\u0131 reddetmektir. Selb\u00ee s\u0131fatlar\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak pratik olarak \u00fc\u00e7 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcte g\u00f6re se\u00e7ildi\u011fini belirtir: tarihsel ba\u011flam, Kur\u2019\u00e2n\u00ee referans ve eksiklikten tenzih ilkesi.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>Tenzih\u2013Te\u015fbih Ayr\u0131m\u0131 ve Kavramsal Derinlik<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n eksikliklerden uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (tenzih), onu m\u00fcmk\u00fcn varl\u0131klardan ay\u0131ran temel ilkedir. Muhta\u00e7l\u0131k, bile\u015fik olma ve cisimsel \u00f6zellik ta\u015f\u0131ma gibi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnlere \u00f6zg\u00fc t\u00fcm vas\u0131flar Tanr\u0131\u2019dan uzak tutulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda selb\u00ee s\u0131fatlar Tanr\u0131\u2019y\u0131, te\u015fbih ihtimaline kar\u015f\u0131 koruyan mant\u0131ksal ara\u00e7lar olarak sunulur.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Bu seminer, klasik kel\u00e2mda Tanr\u0131 tasavvurunun mant\u0131ksal ve kavramsal temelini ortaya koyar. R\u00e2z\u00ee, hem varl\u0131k y\u00fckleminin anlam\u0131n\u0131 hem de selb\u00ee s\u0131fatlar\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015farak, \u0130slam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinde ilah\u00ee varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahiyetine dair g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir metafizik zemini in\u015fa eder.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This seminar explores Fakhr al-D\u012bn al-R\u0101z\u012b\u2019s metaphysical analysis of divine attributes (\u1e63if\u0101t) in the context of proving God\u2019s necessary existence. The session begins with a philosophical inquiry into whether existence (wuj\u016bd) can be predicated of God and transitions into a broader discussion on the nature, justification, and limits of negative (apophatic) attributes (\u1e63if\u0101t salbiyya). R\u0101z\u012b structures his analysis around three classical approaches to distinguishing God\u2019s essence from that of created beings.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Can \u201cExistence\u201d Be Predicated of God?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The question of whether one can say \u201cGod exists\u201d is examined through both theological and logical lenses. R\u0101z\u012b critiques the Mu\u02bftazilite view that wuj\u016bd is a divine attribute, arguing that this leads to conceptual overlap with contingent beings. He instead upholds that predicating existence of God is necessary, while emphasizing that divine existence remains fundamentally distinct from that of contingent entities.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong>Three Philosophical Models for Differentiating God\u2019s Essence<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The seminar presents three classical approaches to how God\u2019s essence differs from other beings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>R\u0101z\u012b\u2019s own view: differentiation by essence (bi\u2019l-dh\u0101t), asserting that God\u2019s very nature is incomparable.<\/li>\n<li>Ab\u016b H\u0101shim\u2019s view: differentiation by the presence of specific \u201cstates\u201d (a\u1e25w\u0101l) such as life, knowledge, and power.<\/li>\n<li>Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s view: differentiation through the absence of additional qualifications (non-composite essence).<\/li>\n<li>R\u0101z\u012b critiques the latter two as philosophically insufficient in establishing a truly unique divine essence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Logic and Justification of Negative Attributes<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>R\u0101z\u012b discusses why many divine attributes are expressed in negative form, such as \u201cnot a body,\u201d \u201cnot spatial,\u201d \u201cnot direction-bound.\u201d He argues that these attributes serve both to preserve the transcendence (tanz\u012bh) emphasized in the Qur\u2019an and to refute the anthropomorphic traits historically attributed to God. While in theory the number of negative attributes is unlimited, in practice they are selected based on three criteria: scriptural use, historical relevance, and their role in preserving divine transcendence.<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><strong>The Tanz\u012bh\u2013Tashb\u012bh Dialectic and Theological Strategy<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Tanz\u012bh (declaring God free from imperfection) becomes the defining line between divine and contingent existence. Attributes such as dependency, composition, and spatiality\u2014applicable to created beings\u2014must be denied of God. Negative attributes thus serve as a rational strategy to prevent anthropomorphism (tashb\u012bh) and maintain theological integrity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This seminar articulates the philosophical and theological foundations of divine attributes in classical kal\u0101m. Through a nuanced critique of rival positions, R\u0101z\u012b builds a robust framework for understanding divine transcendence. His treatment of negative attributes is not merely defensive but part of a systematic metaphysical vision distinguishing the Necessary Being from all contingent realities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>E\u015eREF ALTA\u015e, R\u00c2Z\u0130 OKUMALARI: MUHASSAL 36. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Dersin Amac\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5870","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5870"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5871,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5870\/revisions\/5871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}