{"id":5977,"date":"2025-06-03T13:07:21","date_gmt":"2025-06-03T10:07:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=5977"},"modified":"2025-06-03T13:07:38","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T10:07:38","slug":"5977-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/5977-2\/","title":{"rendered":"ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Dersin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi<\/strong><br \/>\nAbdurrahim Kozal\u0131\u2019n\u0131n <em>el-Muv\u00e2fak\u00e2t<\/em> okumalar\u0131n\u0131n 6. seminerinde, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc mukaddimenin tamamlanmas\u0131 ve d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc mukaddimenin giri\u015f k\u0131sm\u0131 ele al\u0131n\u0131r. Bu seminerin temel amac\u0131, \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin t\u00fcmevar\u0131m temelli bilgi sisteminin nas\u0131l alternatif y\u00f6ntemlere kap\u0131 aralad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermek ve klasik f\u0131k\u0131h usul\u00fc i\u00e7indeki y\u00f6ntem tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6zellikle istihsan ve \u0131st\u0131slah ba\u011flam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmektir. Ayr\u0131ca, usul ilminin kapsam\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131larak hangi konular\u0131n bu disiplinin i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131p almayaca\u011f\u0131na dair teorik \u00e7er\u00e7eve \u00e7izilir.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Ana Temalar ve Tart\u0131\u015fma Ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong>Us\u00fbl ve F\u00fcr\u00fb Ayr\u0131m\u0131: Kat\u2019iyet\u2013Zanniyet \u0130li\u015fkisi<\/strong><br \/>\n\u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re, us\u00fbl t\u00fcmelci ve t\u00fcmevar\u0131msal y\u00f6ntemiyle kat\u2019\u00ee bilgi \u00fcretirken, f\u00fcr\u00fb daha \u00e7ok tekil delillere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in zann\u00ee bilgi \u00fcretir. Kozal\u0131, bu ayr\u0131m\u0131 klasik tan\u0131mlar \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde sorgular: F\u0131k\u0131h do\u011frudan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerle ilgilenirken, us\u00fbl bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6t\u00fcren ilkelerin bilgisine odaklan\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li><strong>\u0130stihsan ve Ist\u0131slah: Kat\u2019\u00ee Temelli Y\u00f6ntemler mi?<\/strong><br \/>\n\u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte kullan\u0131lan baz\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerin t\u00fcmevar\u0131m yoluyla kesin bilgi \u00fcretebildi\u011fini iddia eder. Bunlar aras\u0131nda istihsan ve \u0131st\u0131slah da vard\u0131r. Ancak Kozal\u0131, \u00f6zellikle istihsan\u0131n mahiyetinin h\u00e2l\u00e2 tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, istisna karakteri ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 nedeniyle kat\u2019\u00eelikten uzak oldu\u011funu ifade eder.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Yeni Y\u00f6ntem \u0130mk\u00e2n\u0131: K\u00fcll\u00ee Esaslar ve Modern Perspektif<\/strong><br \/>\n\u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6ntem kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n modern hukuk d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine yak\u0131n oldu\u011funu vurgulayan Kozal\u0131, bu bak\u0131\u015f\u0131n \u2013ister istihsan, ister kaide temelli olsun\u2013 t\u00fcmel bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131yla in\u015fa edildi\u011finde sa\u011flam bir zemin olu\u015fturabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yler. Ancak bu durumun modernist e\u011filimlerle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015febilece\u011fi konusunda da uyar\u0131da bulunur.<\/li>\n<li><strong>K\u00fcll\u00ee\u2013Tekil Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131: Hangisi Daha G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc?<\/strong><br \/>\nK\u00fcll\u00ee esaslar\u0131n, belirli nasslara (tekil delillere) g\u00f6re daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc olabilece\u011fi iddias\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. Tekil nasslar mecaz, tahsis, m\u00fc\u015ftereklik gibi dilsel belirsizlikler bar\u0131nd\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re kat\u2019\u00eelikten uzakt\u0131r; buna kar\u015f\u0131n k\u00fcll\u00ee esaslar t\u00fcmevar\u0131m\u0131n g\u00fcc\u00fcyle daha kapsay\u0131c\u0131 olabilir.<\/li>\n<li><strong>F\u0131k\u0131h Usul\u00fcn\u00fcn Kapsam\u0131: Hangi Konular D\u0131\u015flanmal\u0131?<\/strong><br \/>\nD\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc mukaddimede \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee, f\u0131k\u0131h usul\u00fc i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131p da f\u00fcr\u00fbya etkisi olmayan meselelerin bu disiplinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini savunur. Kozal\u0131, bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n kelam, nahiv, mant\u0131k gibi yard\u0131mc\u0131 ilimlerin us\u00fbl i\u00e7indeki yerini daraltt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunun ise metodolojik a\u00e7\u0131dan sorunlu olabilece\u011fini belirtir.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Us\u00fbl\u2013Kelam \u0130li\u015fkisi: Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee ile Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rma<\/strong><br \/>\nKozal\u0131, \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin kelam\u00ee meseleleri usulden d\u0131\u015flama \u00e7abas\u0131n\u0131, Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin entelekt\u00fcel b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck idealine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulur. Gaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019nin, f\u0131k\u0131h usul\u00fcn\u00fc kelamla i\u00e7 i\u00e7e bir yap\u0131 olarak kurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mutlak \u00e2lim profilinde bu b\u00fct\u00fcnc\u00fcl yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 zorunlu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade eder.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hakikat-i Lugaviyye ile Hakikat-i \u015eer\u2018iyye Ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/strong><br \/>\nNasslar\u0131n do\u011fru anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in vahyin indi\u011fi d\u00f6nemdeki Arap\u00e7a \u00fczerinden yorum yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirten \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin bu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, Kozal\u0131\u2019ya g\u00f6re us\u00fbl\u00fcn asli i\u015flevlerinden biri olan anlam d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc (hakikat\u2013mecaz, \u015fer\u2018\u00ee m\u00fcdahaleler) yans\u0131t\u0131r.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><br \/>\nBu seminer, \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin hukuk metodolojisine dair \u00f6nerdi\u011fi t\u00fcmevar\u0131mc\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n epistemolojik temellerini derinle\u015ftirirken, ayn\u0131 zamanda us\u00fbl ilminin kapsam\u0131 \u00fczerine kritik bir tart\u0131\u015fma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcr. Kozal\u0131, \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin k\u00fcll\u00ee esaslar lehine geli\u015ftirdi\u011fi arg\u00fcmanlar\u0131n, klasik f\u0131k\u0131h usul\u00fc i\u00e7inde \u00f6zg\u00fcn ama yer yer sorunlu noktalara temas etti\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. Kelam ve di\u011fer ilimlerin us\u00fbl d\u0131\u015f\u0131na at\u0131lmas\u0131 gibi \u00f6neriler, disiplini daraltma riski ta\u015f\u0131rken, y\u00f6ntemsel a\u00e7\u0131dan bir yenilenme ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 da ortaya koyar.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong> Purpose and Content of the Seminar<\/strong><br \/>\nThe sixth seminar in Abdurrahim Kozal\u0131\u2019s <em>al-Muw\u0101faq\u0101t<\/em> reading series covers the conclusion of the third <em>muqaddima<\/em> (introductory chapter) and begins the fourth. This session aims to deepen the analysis of Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s epistemological project\u2014especially his use of inductive reasoning (<em>istiqr\u0101<\/em><em>\u02be<\/em>)\u2014and to assess how this opens the door for alternative methodologies within Islamic legal theory. Kozal\u0131 also explores how Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b redefines the scope of <em>u\u1e63\u016bl al-fiqh<\/em> by discussing which subjects properly belong to this discipline.<\/li>\n<li><strong> Main Themes and Discussion Topics<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>The U\u1e63\u016bl\u2013Fur\u016b<\/strong><strong>\u02bf Distinction and the Role of Certainty<\/strong><br \/>\nSh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b argues that <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em> produces <em>qa<\/em><em>\u1e6d<\/em><em>\u02bf<\/em><em>\u012b<\/em> (certain) knowledge through universal and inductive reasoning, while <em>fur\u016b<\/em><em>\u02bf<\/em> (subsidiary rulings) deals with <em>\u1e93ann\u012b<\/em> (probabilistic) knowledge due to its reliance on particular proofs. Kozal\u0131 critically reviews this distinction in light of classical definitions: <em>fiqh<\/em> focuses on specific rulings, whereas <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em> provides the methodological principles that guide their derivation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Istihs\u0101n and Ma\u1e63la<\/strong><strong>\u1e25a: Certainty-Based or Not?<\/strong><br \/>\nSh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b defends methods like <em>istihs\u0101n<\/em> (juristic preference) and <em>istisl\u0101<\/em><em>\u1e25<\/em> (public interest) as potentially capable of yielding certain rulings through inductive reasoning. However, Kozal\u0131 cautions that <em>istihs\u0101n<\/em> is still controversial due to its exceptional nature and lack of clear boundaries, making its claim to certainty questionable.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Opening the Door to New Methodologies<\/strong><br \/>\nKozal\u0131 emphasizes that Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s method of deriving universal principles offers opportunities for modern reformulations of Islamic law. When grounded in a solid universal framework\u2014whether based on <em>istihs\u0101n<\/em> or legal maxims\u2014such methodologies could align with contemporary legal philosophy. However, he warns of the potential overlap with modernist tendencies that may depart from traditional sources.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Are Universal Principles Stronger than Specific Texts?<\/strong><br \/>\nSh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b argues that <em>kulliyy\u0101t<\/em> (universal principles) are epistemologically stronger than isolated <em>na\u1e63\u1e63<\/em> (textual evidences), which can be ambiguous due to metaphor, specification, or multiple meanings. Kozal\u0131 examines this claim and its implications for how textual ambiguity impacts legal certainty.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Redefining the Scope of U\u1e63\u016bl al-Fiqh<\/strong><br \/>\nIn the fourth <em>muqaddima<\/em>, Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b argues that any discussions in <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em> that do not directly affect <em>fur\u016b<\/em><em>\u02bf<\/em> rulings should be excluded. Kozal\u0131 critiques this view, noting that it potentially removes disciplines like theology (<em>kal\u0101m<\/em>), grammar (<em>na<\/em><em>\u1e25w<\/em>), and logic from <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em>, which could impoverish its methodological richness.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Theology and U\u1e63\u016bl: Contrasting with al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b<\/strong><br \/>\nSh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s push to exclude theological issues from <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em> is contrasted with al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s more integrated vision. Kozal\u0131 argues that for al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b, a complete scholar (<em>\u02bf<\/em><em>\u0101lim<\/em>) must unify law, theology, and philosophy\u2014a vision in tension with Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s disciplinary minimalism.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lexical vs. Legal Meaning: Language and Interpretation<\/strong><br \/>\nSh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b insists that Qur\u2019anic and Prophetic texts should be interpreted based on the Arabic usage prevalent at the time of revelation. Kozal\u0131 sees this as part of <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em>\u2019s core function\u2014dealing with shifts in meaning between literal usage, legal redefinition, and metaphorical interpretation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ol start=\"3\">\n<li><strong> Conclusion<\/strong><br \/>\nThis seminar explores both the epistemological depth and methodological implications of Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s legal philosophy. His inductive, universalist approach aims to ground legal reasoning in certainty while challenging the dominance of literalism and overly scholastic <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em> traditions. At the same time, Kozal\u0131 shows that Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s narrowing of <em>u\u1e63\u016bl<\/em>\u2014especially his exclusion of auxiliary sciences\u2014risks oversimplifying the complexity of Islamic legal thought. This tension reveals both the innovation and the limits of Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s project.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 6. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Dersin Amac\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5977","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5977"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5977\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5980,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5977\/revisions\/5980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}