{"id":6044,"date":"2025-06-03T15:59:27","date_gmt":"2025-06-03T12:59:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=6044"},"modified":"2025-06-03T15:59:27","modified_gmt":"2025-06-03T12:59:27","slug":"abdurrahim-kozali-el-muvafakat-54-seminer-ozeti","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/abdurrahim-kozali-el-muvafakat-54-seminer-ozeti\/","title":{"rendered":"ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 54. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 54. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Ana Temalar:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Nesh ve Sistematik Yorum Aras\u0131ndaki Gerilim<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Seminerde \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin nesh kavram\u0131na yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131, <strong>\u00f6nceki fakihlerle mukayeseli<\/strong> olarak devam eder. \u00d6nceki seminerde oldu\u011fu gibi, neshin kapsam\u0131, delalet a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yorum imk\u00e2nlar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r. \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee, bir\u00e7ok durumda g\u00f6r\u00fclen h\u00fck\u00fcm de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinin ger\u00e7ek anlamda nesh de\u011fil, <strong>ba\u011flamla ilgili anla\u015fmazl\u0131klar veya farkl\u0131 okuma bi\u00e7imleri<\/strong> oldu\u011funu savunur.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Neshle \u0130lgili D\u00f6rt Temel Mesele<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Bu oturumda \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin neshle ilgili belirledi\u011fi d\u00f6rt ana mesele detayland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Neshin as\u0131l nedeni \u00e7eli\u015fkidir (ta\u2018\u00e2ruz)<\/strong>: Metinler aras\u0131nda ger\u00e7ek bir \u00e7eli\u015fki varsa, nesh g\u00fcndeme gelir.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Nesh nadirdir<\/strong>: \u00c7o\u011fu nas kendi sistemati\u011fi i\u00e7inde yorumla \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenebilir.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u00d6nceki fakihlerin nesh anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 geni\u015fti<\/strong>: Ancak bu geni\u015flik, yorum \u00e7e\u015fitlili\u011fiyle a\u00e7\u0131klanmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>K\u00fcll\u00ee h\u00fck\u00fcmler nesh edilmez<\/strong>: Evrensel ahlaki ilkeler sabittir, yaln\u0131zca baz\u0131 c\u00fcz\u2019\u00ee h\u00fck\u00fcmler de\u011fi\u015febilir.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>\u0130tibar\u00ee Ak\u0131l ve Din\u00ee Delillerin Dengesi<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re \u015feriat, yaln\u0131zca akla de\u011fil, ayn\u0131 zamanda <strong>vahiyle sabit olmu\u015f mak\u00e2s\u0131d temelli de\u011ferlere<\/strong> dayan\u0131r. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, nesh edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bile bir maksatla ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kopmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, de\u011fi\u015fen \u015fartlarla <strong>ayn\u0131 ilkenin farkl\u0131 bi\u00e7imlerde s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc<\/strong> belirtir. B\u00f6ylece, nesh bir kopu\u015f de\u011fil, <strong>ilkenin form de\u011fi\u015ftirmesidir.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Mezhep \u0130\u00e7tihatlar\u0131n\u0131n Sistemselli\u011fi<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Seminerde ayr\u0131ca, farkl\u0131 mezheplerin nesh ve \u00e7eli\u015fki meselesine dair getirdi\u011fi \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmler de\u011ferlidir. Her mezhep, kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc i\u00e7tihat sistemi i\u00e7inde delilleri <strong>m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olan en az nesh ile a\u00e7\u0131klama<\/strong> e\u011filimindedir. Bu, \u0130slam hukukunda sistemsel yorumun \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Sonu\u00e7:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\">seminer, \u015e\u00e2t\u0131b\u00ee\u2019nin nesh kavram\u0131n\u0131 <strong>salt h\u00fck\u00fcm de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi de\u011fil<\/strong>, metinler aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan \u00e7eli\u015fkilerin sistematik y\u00f6ntemlerle giderilmesi olarak de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. Ona g\u00f6re nesh, son \u00e7are olarak ba\u015fvurulan bir yoldur ve ancak <strong>ger\u00e7ek anlamda bir \u00e7eli\u015fki<\/strong> varsa ge\u00e7erlidir. C\u00fcz\u2019\u00ee h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde form de\u011fi\u015fse de, \u015feriat\u0131n evrensel ilkeleri baki kal\u0131r. Bu anlay\u0131\u015f, \u015feriat\u0131n tarihsel s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7inde ak\u0131l ve hikmetle uyumlu \u015fekilde evrildi\u011fini ortaya koyar.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Main Themes:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Tension Between Abrogation and Systematic Interpretation<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">This seminar continues Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s comparative analysis of <em>naskh<\/em> (abrogation), especially in contrast with earlier jurists. As in previous discussions, he emphasizes that what appears to be legal change is often not genuine abrogation, but rather differences in interpretive approach or contextual understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Four Core Principles of Sh\u0101<\/strong><strong>\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s Theory of Naskh<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b identifies and elaborates on four essential principles in understanding abrogation:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Contradiction (ta<\/strong><strong>\u02bf<\/strong><strong>\u0101ru<\/strong><strong>\u1e0d) as the root cause of naskh<\/strong> \u2013 Only real and irreconcilable contradictions justify abrogation.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Rarity of true abrogation<\/strong> \u2013 Most cases can be resolved through systematic interpretation.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Broad use of naskh by early scholars<\/strong> \u2013 Their expansive use should be seen as interpretive diversity, not doctrinal inconsistency.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Universal principles (kull\u012b) are not subject to abrogation<\/strong> \u2013 Only particular rulings (juz\u02be\u012b) may be modified based on circumstance.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Balance Between Rational Inference and Scriptural Authority<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b affirms that Islamic law is rooted not solely in abstract reason, but in <strong>divinely revealed purposes (maq\u0101\u1e63id)<\/strong>. Thus, even rulings that appear abrogated often express a <strong>continuity of principle<\/strong>, adapted to changing contexts. Abrogation, then, becomes not a rupture, but a <strong>rearticulation of enduring values<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>The Role of Legal Schools and Systematic Ijtih\u0101d<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">The seminar underscores the role of legal schools (<em>madh\u0101hib<\/em>) in minimizing unnecessary abrogation. Each school, through its own methodological framework, tends to explain seemingly conflicting rulings via reconciliation rather than cancellation. This reflects the broader Islamic jurisprudential emphasis on <strong>systematic coherence<\/strong>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Conclusion:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The 54th seminar demonstrates Sh\u0101\u1e6dib\u012b\u2019s commitment to a disciplined, context-aware theory of abrogation. <em>Naskh<\/em> is viewed not as a frequent mechanism of legal change, but as a last resort when contradiction cannot be resolved through interpretation. Even when rulings shift, the foundational objectives of Shar\u012b\u02bfa remain intact. This vision presents Islamic law as a dynamic yet principled system, evolving in form but not in purpose.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABDURRAH\u0130M KOZALI: el-MUV\u00c2FAK\u00c2T 54. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 Ana Temalar: Nesh ve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6044","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6044"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6044\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6045,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6044\/revisions\/6045"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}