{"id":8089,"date":"2025-11-30T14:02:47","date_gmt":"2025-11-30T11:02:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/?page_id=8089"},"modified":"2025-11-30T14:02:47","modified_gmt":"2025-11-30T11:02:47","slug":"ekrem-demirli-sadreddin-konevi-tasavvuf-metafizigi-okumalari-17-seminer-ozeti-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/ekrem-demirli-sadreddin-konevi-tasavvuf-metafizigi-okumalari-17-seminer-ozeti-2\/","title":{"rendered":"EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u0130, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 17. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130"},"content":{"rendered":"

EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u0130, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 17. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n

Seminerin Amac\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n

On yedinci seminerin amac\u0131, Sadreddin Konev\u00ee\u2019nin \u00e2lemin hakikatle ili\u015fkisi<\/em>, varl\u0131k\u2013hakikat ayr\u0131m\u0131<\/em>, delilin hakikati g\u00f6sterme kapasitesi<\/em>, marifetin bilginin \u00f6tesindeki yeri<\/em>, akl\u0131n \u00e2lem \u00fczerinden hakikate ula\u015fma iddias\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131<\/em>, felsefenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131mlamada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yanl\u0131\u015flar<\/em> ve tasavvufun hakikati do\u011frudan tecelli yoluyla a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131<\/em> gibi temel meselelerini ortaya koymakt\u0131r. Ekrem Demirli, bu seminerde \u00f6zellikle \u201c\u00e2lemin hakikati temsil edip etmedi\u011fi\u201d sorununu merkez alarak Konev\u00ee\u2019nin metafizik d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesini yorumlar.<\/p>\n

Ana Temalar<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u00c2lemin Hakikati Temsil Etme Problemi ve G\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015flerin Aldat\u0131c\u0131 Niteli\u011fi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00c2lem, hakikatin do\u011frudan kendisi de\u011fil; hakikatin \u00e7e\u015fitli g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcmlerinin toplam\u0131d\u0131r. \u00c2lemde g\u00f6r\u00fclen hi\u00e7bir \u015fey hakikatin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc birebir yans\u0131tmaz. Bu nedenle \u00e2lem \u00fczerinden hakikate ula\u015fmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Konev\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re \u00e2lem, delil de\u011fildir; yaln\u0131zca i\u015faretlerdir. \u0130\u015faret ise hakikat de\u011fildir, sadece y\u00f6nlendirir.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Felsefenin Delil Aray\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve Delilin Hakikati G\u00f6sterme S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Filozoflar \u00e2leme bakarak hakikate ula\u015facaklar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcr; fakat \u00e2lem delil olmaya elveri\u015fli de\u011fildir. Delil ancak benzerlik ili\u015fkisiyle hakikati g\u00f6sterebilir; oysa \u00e2lemdeki hi\u00e7bir \u015fey hakikatle benzerlik ta\u015f\u0131maz. Bu nedenle akl\u00ee deliller hakikatin \u00f6z\u00fcne de\u011fil, yaln\u0131zca varl\u0131k d\u00fczenine dair s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 yorumlar sunar. Konev\u00ee, delilin hakikati ancak \u00e7ok uzak bir d\u00fczeyde temsil edebilece\u011fini s\u00f6yler.<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Kelam\u0131n Yetersizli\u011fi ve Hakikati Bilmenin Kavramsal \u0130mkan\u0131n\u0131n \u00c7\u00f6k\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Kelam gelene\u011fi, hakikati kavramlar arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla tan\u0131mlamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsa da hakikat kavrama s\u0131\u011fmaz. Tanr\u0131’n\u0131n hakikati, kavramsalla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda eksilir. Bu y\u00fczden kelam\u00ee tarifler, Tanr\u0131’y\u0131 tan\u0131tmak yerine uzakla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 olur. Konev\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re kelam, hakikati temsil eden tan\u0131mlar de\u011fil; insan\u0131n bilgi \u00e7abas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren semboller \u00fcretir.<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Marifetin Delili A\u015fmas\u0131 ve Hakikate Do\u011frudan Y\u00f6neli\u015fi<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          Marifet, delile ihtiya\u00e7 duymaz; do\u011frudan tecelli ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fir. Hakikat kendini a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bilinir. Marifet, ak\u0131lla de\u011fil, kalbin tasfiye edilmesiyle do\u011far. Hakikatin bilgisi insanda meydana gelir; d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan \u00f6\u011frenilmez. Bu nedenle marifet, hakikatin hakikat olarak bilinmesidir \u2014 temsil de\u011fil, i\u015ftirak.<\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Akl\u0131n S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131, Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mertebeleri ve Hakikate Ula\u015fman\u0131n Ontolojik \u015eartlar\u0131<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            Akl\u0131n g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00e2lemdir; hakikati g\u00f6remez. \u00c2lem ise mertebelerden olu\u015fur; her mertebe bir \u00f6ncekinden daha uzak bir g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f i\u00e7erir. Hakikate yakla\u015fmak istidada ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r; istidad\u0131 olmayan ak\u0131l, ne kadar delil \u00fcretirse \u00fcretsin hakikati kavrayamaz. Konev\u00ee\u2019ye g\u00f6re hakikate yol marifetle a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r; ak\u0131l bu yolun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kal\u0131r.<\/p>\n

            Sonu\u00e7<\/strong><\/p>\n

            On yedinci seminer, \u00e2lemin hakikati temsil edemeyece\u011fini; delilin hakikate ula\u015ft\u0131ramayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131; felsefenin ve kelam\u0131n bu temsil yan\u0131lsamas\u0131na d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc; hakikatin ancak marifet yoluyla bilinebilece\u011fini ve marifetin hakikate do\u011frudan i\u015ftirak niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyar. Konev\u00ee\u2019nin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi, hakikatin temsil ile de\u011fil tecelli ile bilinece\u011fini vurgulayan k\u00f6kl\u00fc bir metafizik d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm \u00f6nerir.<\/p>\n

             <\/p>\n

            Purpose of the Seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n

            The purpose of the seventeenth seminar is to present Sadreddin Konev\u00ee\u2019s fundamental issues such as the relationship of the cosmos with truth, the distinction between being and truth, the capacity of proof to show truth, the position of gnosis beyond knowledge, the limits of reason in reaching truth through the cosmos, the errors of philosophy in defining being, and the way in which Sufism explains truth directly through manifestation. In this seminar, Ekrem Demirli interprets Konev\u00ee\u2019s metaphysical thought by centering on the problem of whether the cosmos represents truth.<\/p>\n

            Main Themes<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. The Problem of the Cosmos Representing Truth and the Deceptive Nature of Appearances<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              The cosmos is not the truth itself but the totality of the various appearances of truth. Nothing seen in the cosmos directly reflects the essence of truth. Therefore it is not possible to reach truth through the cosmos. According to Konev\u00ee, the cosmos is not a proof; it is merely signs. And a sign is not truth; it only directs.<\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The Philosophers\u2019 Search for Proof and the Limit of Proof in Showing Truth<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                Philosophers think that they will reach truth by looking at the cosmos; however, the cosmos is not suitable to be a proof. A proof can show truth only through resemblance; yet nothing in the cosmos bears resemblance to truth. For this reason rational proofs offer only limited interpretations concerning the order of being, not the essence of truth. Konev\u00ee states that proof can represent truth only at a very distant level.<\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. The Insufficiency of Kal\u0101m and the Collapse of the Conceptual Possibility of Knowing Truth<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                  The kal\u0101m tradition attempts to define truth through concepts, but truth does not fit into conceptualization. When the truth of God is conceptualized, it becomes diminished. Thus kal\u0101mic definitions do not introduce God; they distance Him. According to Konev\u00ee, kal\u0101m does not produce definitions that represent truth; it produces symbols that show the limits of human knowledge.<\/p>\n

                    \n
                  1. The Surpassing of Proof by Gnosis and the Direct Orientation Toward Truth<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Gnosis does not need proof; it occurs directly through manifestation. Truth is known when it opens itself. Gnosis arises not from reason but from the purification of the heart. The knowledge of truth takes place within the human being; it is not learned from outside. Therefore gnosis is the knowing of truth as truth \u2014 not representation, but participation.<\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. The Limits of Reason, the Levels of Being, and the Ontological Conditions for Reaching Truth<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                      What the intellect sees is the cosmos; it cannot see truth. The cosmos consists of levels; each level contains an appearance more distant than the previous. Approaching truth depends on aptitude; the intellect that lacks aptitude cannot grasp truth no matter how many proofs it produces. According to Konev\u00ee, the path to truth opens through gnosis; the intellect remains outside this path.<\/p>\n

                      Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

                      The seventeenth seminar shows that the cosmos cannot represent truth; that proof cannot lead to truth; that philosophy and kal\u0101m fall into the illusion of representation; that truth can be known only through gnosis; and that gnosis carries the quality of directly participating in truth. Konev\u00ee\u2019s thought proposes a profound metaphysical transformation that emphasizes that truth is known not through representation but through manifestation.<\/p>\n

                       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                      EKREM DEM\u0130RL\u0130, SADREDD\u0130N KONEV\u0130, TASAVVUF METAF\u0130Z\u0130\u011e\u0130 OKUMALARI 17. SEM\u0130NER \u00d6ZET\u0130 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-8089","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8089"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8090,"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8089\/revisions\/8090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/klasikdusunceokulu.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}